Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;2019(9):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5

EMERALD 2000.

Methods RCT
Double‐blind
Loss to follow‐up reported: yes
Participants Persistent AF (1 week to 1 year, mean duration < 6 months). n = 535
Men: 70%
Age (mean): 64 years
Structural heart disease: NS. LAD: NS. LVEF: NS
Interventions Dofetilide 250 µg/day, 500 µg/day or 1000 µg/day (3 different groups) vs sotalol 160 mg/day vs placebo
Method of AF cardioversion: 10% pharmacological, 90% electrical
Warfarin discretionary
Outcomes At 12 months:
Mortality
Adverse effects
Proarrhythmia
AF recurrence
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description of the method employed.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment not described.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Presented as "double‐blind", but no detail given about how blinding was obtained.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals and dropouts were well detailed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes are adequately reported.
Other bias Low risk No other bias apparent.