Kuhlkamp 2000.
Methods | RCT Double‐blind Loss to follow‐up reported: yes |
|
Participants | Persistent AF lasting 2 days to 1 year (mean duration: 3 months). n = 394 Men: 70% Age (mean): 60 (range 24–86) years Structural heart disease: 36%. LAD: 42 mm. LVEF: 64% |
|
Interventions | Metoprolol 100 mg/day vs placebo Method of AF cardioversion: pharmacological 18%, electrical 82% Warfarin discretionary |
|
Outcomes | At 6 months: Mortality Proarrhythmia Adverse effects AF recurrence |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation list. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation after inclusion. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind study. Quote: "The placebo tablets were identical in size, weight, colour, and taste to the metoprolol CR/XL [controlled‐release/extended release] tablets". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Withdrawals and lost to follow‐up were balanced between groups and well described. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes and expected outcomes of interest were well reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias apparent. |