Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;2019(9):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5

Reimold 1993.

Methods RCT
Open‐label
Loss to follow‐up reported: yes
Participants Any symptomatic AF or AFl. Type: paroxysmal 47%, persistent 53% (mean duration: 36 months). n = 100
Men: 64%
Age (mean): 61 (SD 12) years
Structural heart disease: 81%. LAD: 46 mm. LVEF: 59%
Interventions Propafenone 675 mg/day vs sotalol 320 mg/day
Method of AF cardioversion: both pharmacological and electrical, % NS
Warfarin discretionary
Outcomes At 12 months:
Mortality
Proarrhythmia
Adverse effects
AF recurrence
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation stratification scheme using a permuted blocks design generated before initiation of the trial.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Drug assignment provided in sealed envelopes by a research pharmacist.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not described as a blind study.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Participants lost to follow‐up were not clearly detailed but seemed to be few. Analysis was intention‐to‐treat.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes and expected outcomes were well reported.
Other bias Low risk No other bias apparent.