Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jun 18;30(8):871–876. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01194-y

Table 2.

Association between marital status and mortality in patients treated for localized prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy, 1994 to 2004 (n=3579)

All-Cause Death Prostate Cancer-Specific Death
Total person-time (years) Number of Deaths (n=437) Unadjusted HR (95%) Adjusteda HR (95% Cl) Number of Deaths (n=62) Unadjusted HR (95%) Adjustedb HR (95% Cl)
Marital Status (binary)c
 Married 31,608.6 369 Ref Ref 51 Ref Ref
 Not Married 4502.2 68 1.35(1.04,1.75) 1.42 (1.10, 1.85) 11 1.57(0.82, 3.02) 1.97(1.01,3.83)
Marital Historyc
 Married 31,608.6 369 Ref Ref 51 --- ---
 Divorced 1834.3 23 1.10 (0.73,1.68) 1.13 (0.74,1.73) 4 --- ---
 Widowed 827.4 18 1.95 (1.21,3.12) 1.47 (0.91,2.38) 1 --- ---
 Never Married 1840.5 27 1.33 (0.90,1.97) 1.77 (1.19,2.63) 6 --- ---

CI=confidence interval; HR=hazards ratio; PSA=prostate-specific antigen.

a

Model includes marital history (married, divorced, widowed, never married), age, race, comorbidity, log-transformed PSA, Biopsy Gleason grade

b

Model includes marital status (married vs. not married), age, race, comorbidity, log-transformed PSA, Biopsy Gleason grade

c

Marital status (binary) and marital history were analyzed in separate models.