. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Aug 7;49(1):118–133. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1491005

Table 3.

Parameter Estimates for Effects of Negative Life Events on Adolescent Depressive Symptoms, Moderated by Neural Cognitive Control

	Model Fit
	χ²	df	CFI	RMSEA
Main effects model	4.85	7	1.00	0.00
Interaction effects model	10.73	9	0.99	0.04
	Parameter estimates
	Effect on intercept		Effect on slope
	B [95% CI]	b^* [95% CI]	B [95% CI]	b^* [95% CI]
Step 1: Main effects
Positive life events	0.11 [−0.06; 0.29]	.11 [−.05; .27]	−0.03 [−0.11; 0.06]	−.09 [−.39; .21]
Negative life events	0.22^* [0.05; 0.38]	.22^* [.05; .38]	−0.01 [−0.09;0.07]	−.03 [−.34; .27]
Neural cognitive control	1.14^* [0.15; 2.13]	.19^* [.03; .34]	0.07 [−0.41; 0.56]	.05 [−.25; .34]
Step 2: Interaction effects
Positive life events^*Neural cognitive control	−0.06 [−0.33; 0.21]	−.03 [−.15; .10]	−0.11 [−0.25; 0.03]	−.18 [−.43; .06]
Negative life events^*Neural cognitive control	0.55^* [0.07; 1.02]	.17^* [.02; .32]	−0.02 [−0.23; 0.20]	−.02 [−.27; .23]

Note. Model is controlled for adolescent sex. Neural cognitive control was operationalized as interference-related BOLD responses during MSIT with higher values indicating lower neural cognitive control.

p < .05.