Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019 May 14;3(7):1158–1169. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00051

Zero- and high-pressure mechanisms in the complex forming reactions of OH with methanol and formaldehyde at low temperatures

Fedor Naumkin †,a, Pablo del Mazo-Sevillano , Alfredo Aguado , Yury V Suleimanov ¶,ǁ, Octavio Roncero §,*
PMCID: PMC6739233  EMSID: EMS84231  PMID: 31511842

Abstract

A recent Ring Polymer Molecular Dynamics study of the reactions of OH with methanol and formaldehyde, at zero pressure and below 100 K, has shown the formation of long lived complexes, with long lifetimes, longer than 100 ns for the lower temperatures studied, 20-100 K (del Mazo-Sevillano et al., 2019). These long lifetimes support the existence of multi collision events with the He buffer-gas atoms under experimental conditions, as suggested by several transition state theory studies of these reactions. In this work we study these secondary collisions, as a dynamical approach to study pressure effects on these reactions. For this purpose, the potential energy surfaces of He with H2CO, OH, H2O and HCO are calculated at highly accurate ab initio level. The stability of some of the complexes is studied using Path Integral Molecular dynamics techniques, determining that OH-H2CO complexes can be formed up to 100 K or higher temperatures, while the weaker He-H2CO complexes dissociate at approximately 50 K. The predicted IR intensity spectra shows new features which could help the identification of the OH-H2CO complex. Finally, the He-H2CO + OH and OH-H2CO + He collisions are studied using quassi-classical trajectories, finding that the cross section to produce HCO + H2O products increases with decreasing collision energy, and that it is ten times higher in the He-H2CO + OH case.

Keywords: Pressure effects, Ring polymer molecular dynamics, potential energy surfaces, collision complexes, astrochemistry, reactive collisions at low temperatures

1. Introduction

Organic molecules are among the most complex molecules observed in space, and they are called complex organic molecules1 (COMs, while this term is generally attributed to molecules with more than 6 atoms, here we include formaldehyde among them to simplify). These molecules were first detected in the gas phase in hot cores or corinos,25 at about 50 K or higher temperatures. It was then accepted that these molecules were formed on ices mantles of grains in cold cores, at 10 K, and then released to the gas phase in hot cores for dust temperatures of ≈ 100 K.6 Probably among the most abundant COMs, formaldehyde2 and methanol3 are efficiently formed by radiation of CO-H2 mixture ices7,8 and by successive hydrogenation of CO on dust grains.912 These reactions involving H-abstraction present barriers associated to the breaking of a bond prior to the formation of a new one, making very improbable their formation in the gas phase at low temperatures.

More recently, COMs were also detected in other environments, such as UV-shielded cold cores1316 at 10K, outflows1719 and photodissociation regions.20,21 At 10 K in cold cores, molecules formed on ices do not thermally desorb, and several hypothesis such desorption induced by cosmic rays or by chemical desorption22,23 are possible. Molecules with a strong electric dipole, such as methanol, are strongly bonded to the ice and do not easily desorb after UV absorption, and recent measurements have found that these molecules break releasing their photofragments to the gas phase.24,25 A combined route is therefore possible, a synthesis on ices followed by a postprocessing in the gas phase.

This gas phase route was open recently by Heard and co-workers26 who measured an extraordinary acceleration of the OH + CH3OH reaction at temperatures below 100 K, confirmed by other experiments later.2730 This behavior was also found in many other reactions of OH with organic compounds involving alcohol, ether, and aldehyde groups3135 when studied using laval expansion experiments. In these experiments, the measured reaction rate showed a non-Arrhenius behavior, with V-shaped form versus temperature, with a minimum at about 200-300 K for all of them, independently of the height of the reaction barrier. The increase of the reaction rate constant below 100 K was originally explained by the formation of collision complexes between reactants followed by tunneling through the reaction barrier.26,35 The formation of the complex is very reasonable because all the organic molecules studied have strong dipole moments giving rise to important long range interactions with OH, and a relatively deep well associated to the COM-OH complex. However, some controversy, associated to the tunneling, persists as explained below.36

Several transition state theory (TST) studies have been performed,30,3638 especially on the OH + CH3OH reaction, concluding that the tunneling is too low. In all these studies, the rise of the reaction rate constant is explained by the pressure. First, Siebrand and co-workers36 proposed a model based on the formation of methanol dimer in the expansion. However, a high density of dimers is necessary to reproduce the experimental data, which seems to be too high according to the experimental conditions.39 Later, Gao and co-workers37 made a systematic study of this reaction using the competitive canonical unified statistical (CCUS) model in the low and high pressure limits, showing that at low temperatures the rate constant becomes pressure dependent. In this model,37 the stabilization of the reaction complex in the low pressure limit (LPL) was not included and only at high pressure the complex is formed over a wide energy interval thus allowing tunneling. More recently, the formation of the complex was considered within the low pressure limit in a TST formalism,30 but it was necessary to consider also the high pressure limit (HPL) to get a good agreement with the experimental data below 100K, fitting some free parameters of the models. Also, the OH + CH3OH reaction was recently studied using a two-dimensional master-equation/semi-classical TST/variational Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus approach, and it was found that below 250 K the reaction rate constant depends strongly on pressure.

The pressure dependence at low temperature is nearly impossible to eliminate from the CRESU experiments (French acronym of the uniform gas expansion technique) due to the necessity of using a buffer gas, usually helium, in the laval expansion.2630 However, in the interstellar medium the density is very low and the LPL rate constant is needed in astrophysical models. It is therefore of paramount importance to combine experimental and theoretical studies to extract the LPL reaction cross section. For doing so, dynamical studies without ad hoc parameters are expected to be of great help. At this regards, we have recently developed the full dimensional potential energy surface (PES) for two reactions, H2CO33,40 and CH3OH41 with OH. Quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) calculations performed on these potentials showed the mentioned increase of the reaction rate constant below 100 K, originated by a complex forming mechanism in the two reactions. Thus, for H2CO + OH, the QCT rate constants are in rather good agreement with the experimental data,33 while for CH3OH + OH,41 with higher barriers, the calculated rate constant remains nearly constant below 100 K, in qualitative agreement with the previous TST studies. However, quantum effects are important at low temperatures, such as tunneling and zero-point energy (ZPE). In order to include these effects, very recently Ring Polymer Molecular Dynamics (RPMD) calculations were performed on the reactions of OH with formaldehyde and methanol42 showing the formation of extremely long lived collision complexes, with lifetimes longer than 100 ns, and a very large capture rate. This finding opens the possibility that the zero-pressure reaction cross section of these reactions also increases below 100 K, and it is important to determine as accurately as possible such effects.

In this work, we present a preliminary study of the pressure effect by determining the effects of the interaction of the reactants with helium on the H2CO + OH reaction dynamics. The manuscript is distributed as follows. In section II the method used for the analytical representation of the full dimensional PESs is briefly presented and extended to the case of including the interactions with He. In section III, previous dynamical calculations, QCT and RPMD, are summarized and discussed for the title reactions, to show the results in the zero-pressure limit. In section IV, preliminary QCT calculations are presented for the H2CO + OH system in the presence of one Helium atom as a prototype to study the pressure effect dynamically. Finally, section V is devoted to extract some conclusions.

2. Potential energy surfaces

The two reactions studied here present exothermic H-abstraction mechanism with barriers,

H2CO+OHHCO+H2O (1)

and

CH3OH+OHCH3O+H2OR1CH3OH+OHCH2OH+H2OR2. (2)

The study of reaction dynamics at low temperature requires the use of highly accurate ab initio methods to reproduce long range interactions, reaction barriers, etc. Also, long propagation times are needed, involving many integration steps and many evaluations of the electronic energy. Therefore, it is required the use of hyperdimensional potential energy surfaces, which are generally developed as analytic fits of ab initio points.

Recently, analytical fits of the full dimensional PES have been developed for the two title reactions,40,41 which were partitioned in two terms, Hdiab + HMB. Hdiab is a diabatic matrix in which each diagonal element (channel) corresponds to a single rearrangement channel. For H2CO + OH this matrix is of dimension 3× 3 (there are two equivalent products channel in Eq. (1)), and for CH3OH + OH the dimension is 5 (there are 3 equivalent channels in Eq. (2.b)). This terms includes the long range dipole-dipole interaction between reactants, crucial in the low temperature dynamics. The second term, HMB, is the many-body term described by permutationally invariant polynomials following the method of Aguado et al.43,44 For the two reactions studied, more than 2 × 105 CCSD(T)-F12a ab initio points have been used to fit this term, as described previously for H2CO + OH40 and CH3OH +OH,41 respectively. The details of the corresponding PESs are summarized in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Minimum energy paths for H2CO +OH (left) and CH3OH+OH (right) reactions, summarizing the main features of the PESs. For the CH3OH + OH case, black and red lines correspond to CH2OH + H2O and CH3O + H2O products, respectively. In dashed lines, a common path for both reactions from the asymptotic reactant geometries to the reactive complex is presented.

In both cases, there is a dipole-dipole long range interaction between OH and the COM that determines the capture, and a well of ≈ 0.3 eV, corresponding to the collision complex COM⋯ OH. The electric dipole in H2CO is parallel to the CO bond while in CH3OH it goes approximately from the center of C-O bond to the opposite side of H in the OH group, as indicated schematically in Fig. 1.

The lowest barrier is that of H2CO +OH reaction (of ≈ 27 meV without ZPE), while for methanol the barriers are higher, of 89 and 289 meV for the R2 and R1 mechanisms in Eq. 2, corresponding to the abstraction of one H from the CH3 or OH group. For methanol, the minimum energy path (MEP) shows a common reactive complex for both reactions, respectively. For the abstraction of an H via R1 reaction, the oxygen of the OH radical has to approach the hydrogen of the alcohol group, being that a movement of shorter amplitude than via R2. This explains why QCT calculations predict the branching ratio CH3O/CH2OH to be approximately 3 below 100 K.

The interaction of He is considered additive since He is chemically inert. In the case of reaction 1, it is built by adding the He-OH and He-H2CO interactions to their corresponding matrix diagonal elements in Hdiab term briefly described above. Each interaction term is build individually keeping the molecule frozen in its equilibrium geometry and performing high-level ab initio calculations for multiple positions of He around it, as detailed below.

2.1. Interactions with He atoms

For consistency, we have used the same R/CCSD(T)-F12a method with the cc-PVQZ-F12 basis set, both implemented in the MOLPRO package,45 as in the previous papers.40,41 Energies for each PES have been calculated for 19 radial points between 2 and 10 Å(spaced more densely near the minima) along 9 cuts between 0° and 180°, with the polar-coordinate origin at the center of mass of the molecule (H2CO, HCO, H2O or OH). Then the values have been interpolated with cubic splines radially and with Legendre polynomials angularly. The radial cuts have been extrapolated beyond 10 Å with a R−6 tail. For He-H2CO, coplanar and several nonplanar (with He located respectively in and out of the molecule plane) 2D sub-PES have been produced. The obtained energy variation with the dihedral angle ϕ= HeOCH between 0° (planar) and 90° (perpendicular) geometry has been closely approximated with a switching function sin2 ϕ via V = V0 + (V90V0) sin2 ϕ. A similar approach has been used for the He-H2O and He-HCO, the latter featuring two planar half-PESs, with and without the H atom. The PES are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Contour maps (in cm−1) of the calculated He-H2CO PES (top), for planar and perpendicular configurations, and He-OH A´ and A´´ PES (bottom).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Contour maps (in cm−1) of the calculated He-HCO (top) and He-H2O planar and perpendicular (left and right) PES.

The He-H2CO PES has four minima of energy, with He axially at each end of the molecule (more stably between the H atoms of H2CO) and at the symmetric co-planar positions near-perpendicular to the C-O axis, which are slightly still more stable. This is consistent with the earlier work.46 The relative stabilities of these conformers could be interpreted by the combination of van der Waals interactions and those with the partial charges on atoms. In particular, the deeper collinear minimum in the H side relative to that in the O side could be due to smaller H’s allowing for a closer approach of He and stronger interactions with their charges. The deepest minimum in the near-T-shaped conformation could benefit from the stronger He-O as compared to He-H van der Waals interaction. In addition, the reduction of the He-H interaction might be responsible for destabilization in the nonplanar geometries. Alternative interpretations are based on the relative repulsion of He by the electron density of the CO component in different geometries46.

For He-OH, both A´ and A´´ PESs are shallower and flatter angularly, with the stable energy minimum for A´ corresponding to He attached sideways and shifted to (smaller) H. Accordingly, the lower-energy A´-state PES has been employed further in the present work.

The removal of H from H2CO, making HCO, destabilizes the interaction with He, especially for the coplanar minimum of energy on the “H-lacking” side. This minimum becomes much more delocalized, shallower towards the O end, and thus destroys the axial minimum there via removing the barrier separating it. Similar evolutions apply to the He-H2O interaction when the system is transformed to He-OH. In addition to becoming shallower, more so towards the H end, the energy minimum is fully delocalized around the O-H axis, thus transforming to a ring.

The He-H2O PES features only symmetric coplanar wells on the sides of the molecule, and, unlike the He-H2CO, no axial minima, even in the hollow between the H atoms. This could be related to the repulsion of He from the electron density of the doubly-occupied p-orbital of oxygen perpendicular to the plane of H2O (composing its HOMO orbital). Upon “insertion” of C in the middle of H2O to make H2CO, this density is moved axially inwards from both ends of the molecule, more so on the H side.

The above PESs parameters are listed in Table 1 and compared with the previous values from literature.

Table 1. Calculated equilibrium parameters of the He complexes.

System De (cm−1) Re (Å) Θe
He-H2CO 44.0 3.27 91°
Ref.46 59.4 3.08 97°
He-OH 29.8 2.98 108°
Ref47 30.0 3.01 111°
Ref48 29.8 3.01 111°
Ref.49 29.8 3.02 113°
He-HCO 35.3 3.21 104°
He-H2O 33.4 3.13 104°
Ref.50 34.1 3.14 104°
Refs.51,52 34.9 3.12; 3.13 102°; 105°
Ref.53 30.4 3.19 101°

Our He-H2CO PES exhibits a somewhat lower binding than the previous basis-set extrapolated CCSD(T) one46. This could be related to using (smaller) aug-cc-PVXZ (X=D,T) basis sets for the extrapolation of that PES. They have also calculated a well depth of about 50 cm−1 for the aug-cc-PVQZ basis set, matched by our value more closely. A further support comes from comparison of the PES parameters of similar, same-core He-CO. The corresponding previous results46 are De = 23.4 cm−1 at Re = 3.46 Å and θe = 63.2°, while the extrapolation with larger aug-cc-PVXZ (X=T,Q) basis sets in later work54 gives 22.0 cm−1 at 3.40 Åand 70.8°, matched better by our 21 cm−1 at 3.40 Å and 69°.

For He-OH, our PES appears to be in a good agreement with the recent PESs also obtained at the RCCSD(T) level and using aug-cc-PVTZ+spdfg-bond-functions,47 aug-cc-PV5Z+spdfg-bond-functions48 or basis-set-extrapolated from aug-cc-PVXZ (X=Q,5,6).49 The differences do not exceed 1% in both De and Re or 5% in θe.

The deepest well for HCO (in the coplanar conformation) is about 20% (10 cm−1) shallower than for H2CO and shifts slightly nearer to the molecule as a result of the H atom removal. Such variations increase for the axial energy minimum on the H side and further for the shallowest coplanar minimum on the “H-lacking” side (up to 20 cm−1 in De). The energy gap between the axial (H-side) and deepest minima thus increases from about 5 cm−1 in H2CO to about 10 cm−1 in HCO. It is worth noting that upon removal from HCO of the remaining H to make CO, the interaction with He is consistently destabilazed further. In particular, the coplanar well becomes symmetrically shallower on both sides while the axial well is levelled out.

For He-H2O, our PES parameters are close to those from previous works at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-PVQZ+spdfg-bond-functions50 and SAPT51,52 levels within 1 cm−1 and 0.01 Å. Somewhat larger differences, up to 10% in De, are found from the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-PVTZ data53 with a smaller basis set.

The weak He-H2CO interaction is predicted to be represented by a couple of weak IR spectral lines of the complex in the low-frequency range of under 100 cm−1 (Fig. 4). While the main set of lines, above 1000 cm−1 and up to an order of magnitude more intense, is essentially preserved from the isolated H2CO, the variations do not exceed 3 cm−1 shift in the line positions. This is different for the (more strongly) hydrogen-bonded OH-H2CO complex. The three major lines of H2CO, one near 1800 and two 3000 cm−1 are affected relatively weakly, via a 10 cm−1 red-shift or 30-40 cm−1 blue-shift, respectively, and the latter pair is almost halved in intensity. The formation of the complex is clearly manifested by the three new bright lines near 500-600 and 3600 cm−1, all dominated by OH vibrations. The latter, most intense line corresponds to the O-H stretch, red-shifted by about 170 cm−1 and brightened by more than an order of magnitude relative to the isolated OH. This is likely due to H atom shuttling between two O atoms, accompanied by considerable dipole-moment alterations. The above shift is nearly identical to 175 cm−1, predicted55 at the same level of theory for the OH-CH3OH complex (while their corresponding experimental shift is 50 cm−1 smaller). The similarity of the shifts suggests similar influences on OH of CH2O and CH3OH, which, however, have rather different dipole moments calculated as 2.39 and 1.67 D, respectively. A likely rationalization here is a less favorable (interaction-wise) alignment of the molecular-component dipoles in OH-CH2O relative to OH-CH3OH. This is consistent with the smaller total dipole of the former compared to the latter, predicted to be, respectively, about 3.56 and 4.03 D. The other two lines originate from the OH-bending (H-wagging) vibrations in and (lower-frequency) perpendicular to the H2CO plane. These are less than half as bright as the OH-stretching mode but of about double intensity compared to the H2CO-related lines. These two lines are beyond the range investigated in the earlier work.55

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Calculated IR intensity spectra of He-H2CO (top) and OH-H2CO. In the top panel, the OH line is added for clarity.

By comparison, the predicted spectrum of the (H2CO)2 dimer is dominated by the lines of a monomer. Only a couple of lines, in the 100-200 cm−1 range, with an intensity half of the monomer are new and can be considered as a representative of the dimer.

3. Dynamics of the gas phase reaction: zero pressure

The reaction dynamics was studied using a QCT method for H2CO+OH33,40 and CH3OH +OH.41 For the H2CO + OH reaction, QCT results mimic rather satisfactorily the experimental data, showing an increase below 300 K as the experimental results. The reaction barrier in this case is only of 27 meV (≈ 232 K), which is reduced to only ≈ 10 meV when ZPE is taken into account. This small energy can be easily transfered due to anharmonic effects from the orthogonal vibrational modes, and this could explain why QCT works so well.

In contrast, the QCT obtained for the CH3OH +OH reaction do not show an increase as important as the experimental results below 200 K. This disagreement was attributed to quantum effects, such as tunneling and ZPE, important at low temperature.

Rigorous quantum methods are not feasible due to the high number of dimensions involved in the reaction dynamics. RPMD method, which has already shown itself as a reliable alternative5660 was used recently to study the reactions of OH with formaldehyde and methanol.42 RPMD is a semiclassical formalism based on Path Integral Molecular Dynamics (PIMD) which includes quantum effects as ZPE61 and tunneling,62 and it has been demonstrated to be a very powerful technique to describe low-temperature reaction dynamics.60?

In Ref.,42 the RPMD description of the two reactions under study followed two very different mechanisms, one direct at T> 200 K and a second indirect at T<200 K, as it is shown in Fig. 5. The direct mechanism corresponds to a H-abstraction mechanism. This process is fast, and all reactive RPMD trajectories which finish in less than few ps were considered to be direct. Note that the time required for the approach of the two reactants (capture time) is rather long because of the low temperatures considered, becoming an important fraction of the whole time of each trajectory.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Direct reaction and direct rate constants obtained with the RPMD method for H2CO + OH (left panel) and CH3OH reactions (right panels). The QCT reaction rate constants are taken from Refs.,40,41 respectively. The [1,2,3] experimental results are Refs.33,63,64 for H2CO + OH reaction and26,27,29 for CH3OH+OH reactions, respectively.

The indirect mechanism corresponds to trapping, and a typical RPMD trajectory of this type obtained for the CH3OH +OH reaction at 50 K is shown in Fig. 6. At such low temperature, the capture increases because of the strong long range dipole-dipole interaction. This implies that the maximum impact parameter increases significantly, and the dipole-dipole interaction is able to deviate the trajectory until the two reactants start rotating around each other, as shown in the left panel of Fig. 6. Along this rotation, the vector R is turning along a circular orbit as shown by the azimuthal angle ϕR in the top-right panel of the figure. However, the relative orientation of the two reactants is kept fixed, as well as the torsional angle γCH3OH, shown in the same figure, in a configuration very close to the minimum of the CH3OH⋯ OH well. This implies that the two reactants have a high rotational angular momentum, and also the end-over-end angular momentum is very high. On the contrary, the internal vibrations of the reactants and the van der Waals stretching between them (shown in the lower panel of Fig. 6) keep restricted to a much narrower radial interval, demonstrating that these modes are not very excited in the complexes. Similar results were recently reported for the H2CO+OH reaction described above,42 indicating that this is a rather general result, and that these kind of resonances have a very long lifetime, what gives rise to the trapping.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Evolution of the vector R, between the centers-of-mass of reactants using the centroid for a RPMD trajectory at 50 K (left panels) for the CH3OH +OH reaction. In the upper right panels, the evolution of the angles between R and rOH and rCO and rOH are displayed for a short period of time. The angle ϕR = arctan (Rx/Rz) represents the end-over-end rotation of OH with respect to CH3OH. The angle γ is the torsion angle of CH3OH corresponding to one of the H atoms with respect to the COH group.

At this point we differentiate between capture and trapping. Capture is the first part of the trajectory in which the strong dipole-dipole interaction forces the two fragments to approach each other, as in the first 25 ps of the RPMD trajectory of Fig. 6. The capture is responsible for the orbital motion of reactants with respect to each other. When running classical trajectories, this kind of orbits is also obtained, but the difference is that they only live for a few ps. However, when quantum effects are considered, like in the RPMD trajectories, the number of open channels of the reactants is very small, and the collision complex lifetime increases a lot. These quantum effects give rise to the trapping of the collision complexes for very long times, which we estimate here to be longer than 0.1 μs.

These long complex lifetimes become closer to the time scale of tunneling through barriers, making possible that the reaction may take place. In fact, the collision complex can dissociate back to reactants, the redissociation process, or tunnel to form products. Therefore, complex forming reactive rate constant is given by

kCF(T)=ktrap(T)ktunnel(T)ktunnel(T)+krediss(T), (3)

where ktrap(T) is shown in Fig. 5 in blue. In this expression, ktunnel(T) and krediss(T) are the tunneling and redissociation rate constants, respectively.

In the case of H2CO + OH reaction, the ktunnel(T)/[ktunnel(T) + krediss(T)] branching ratio was taken from the QCT calculations, leading to results rather similar to the experimental values.42 The differences were attributed to inaccuracies of the PES specially at high temperatures, and some work is now-a-days in progress to solve this problem. In addition, pressure effects may also play a role, but only at low temperature, as discussed below.

In the case of CH3OH + OH, the ktunnel(T)/[ktunnel(T) + krediss(T)] ratio was obtained from the low pressure TST studies performed by Ocaña et al.,30 following the method explained before.42 The total reaction rate constant is the sum of the direct and complex forming contribution. In this study, we have added the results obtained for 20 K for the CH3OH + OH reaction, which were not included before, and that are shown in Fig. 7. The RPMD results combined with the TST ratio are always larger than the TST results obtained in the low pressure limit by Ocaña et al.30 and Gao et al.,37 showing that the trapping is more efficient when the system is treated in full dimensions and when the quantum effects are taken into account. The agreement with the experimental data is excellent, except for 20 K, where the RPMD is slightly higher than the experimental result due essentially to the increase of the ktunnel(T)/[ktunnel(T) + krediss(T)] ratio. This good agreement for the CH3OH +OH reaction may be taken in part as fortuitous since there are aspects to be improved in the simulations, namely the potential energy surface and the calculation of the ktunnel(T)/[ktunnel(T)+ krediss(T)] ratio which should also include the multidimensional character. Nevertheless, these results indicate that the experimental results reported below 100 K26,27,29,30 can also be explained by assuming the zero-pressure limit, and not only by assuming pressure effects as used in TST-like formalisms so far.30,37,38 It is therefore of paramount importance to determine the real effect of pressure on the experimental reaction rate constant not only by fitting their role to the experimental data, but by performing dynamical calculations.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Total reaction rate constant obtained in the zero-pressure limit for the CH3OH + OH reaction with the RPMD calculations. The results were obtained in Ref.42 except that obtained for 20K, added in this work. The [1,2,3,4] experimental results are from Refs.,26,27,29,30 respectively. LPL–CCUS are taking from Ref.37 TST referes to the TST (RRKM) results obtained in the LPL in Ref.30

The fact that pressure may play a role in the experimental values reported is justified by the long lifetimes of the collision complexes, since at the densities of the laval expansion at low temperatures the time between collisions with the buffer gas is estimated to be of the order of 1-100 μs (E. Jiménez, private communication). Thus, long-lived collision complex can collide with the buffer gas used in CRESU experiments. This result reconciliates with the high pressure TST models to explain the rise of the reaction rate constant at low temperatures and, at the same time, is taken as an indication that the reaction rate constant at zero pressure also increases at low temperatures. Such collisions induce changes which are responsible for the pressure effects, and deserve a further study, which is presented below.

4. Collisions with He: high pressure effects

In the laval expansions used in the CRESU experiments there must be a buffer gas. This buffer gas is frequently Helium, and it is more than 3 orders of magnitude more abundant than any of the two reactants, the COM and the OH. Also, in general, the density of the COM is higher than that of OH, because this radical is produced by photolysis (E. Jiménez, private communication). At low temperatures, complexes like He⋯ H2CO, He⋯ OH, H2CO ⋯ H2CO and OH ⋯ H2CO will be formed in this order if only relative density is considered.

However, stability will also play a role. For example, the RPMD study discussed above allows us to say that the OH ⋯ H2CO complexes are formed and live long enough between 100 and 200 K. Here we will also like to study at what temperature He⋯ H2CO complexes are no longer formed, or live short time. For doing so, we have performed PIMD calculations with no contraints for H2CO and He⋯ H2CO at several temperatures. 106 integrations were done in each PIMD propagation, and the average free energy is calculated,65 see Fig. 8. The zero of energy is taken at the bottom of the H2CO well, isolated, and the He ⋯ H2CO van der Waals interaction is weak and negative. Therefore, at low temperature < E >HeH2CO is below that of bare H2CO, < E >H2CO. As temperature increases, more and more levels are populated, and soon the weak He ⋯ H2CO interaction is broken, i.e. the continuum states of He +H2CO are populated which have a positive energy. As a consequence, the order of the mean energy is reversed at 100 K, and the crossing point is at ≈ 50 K. In addition, the distribution of the distance between He and the center of mass of H2CO increases a lot for T > 50 K, what is also taken as an indication that at those temperatures the He⋯ H2CO complex dissociates fast. We take T = 50 K as a rough estimate of the temperature at which the He⋯ H2CO dissociates fast. This temperature for the OH⋯ H2CO complex is higher, above 100 K. We can then separate the contributions of these two complexes in two temperature ranges: while both are important below 50 K, between 50 and 150 K only the OH⋯ H2CO collision complexes are playing a significant role.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Mean energy of H2CO and He⋯ H2CO as a function of temperature

In order to study how energy is transferred in collisions of any of these complexes with other species in the beam, we present here the QCT results for the H2CO ⋯ He + OH and H2CO ⋯ OH + He collisions, to determine which are the dominant fragmentation channels. In the two cases, the initial conditions are determined by the adiabatic switching method,6669 using the normal modes calculated at the bottom of the corresponding potential well, as described previously.33,40 The interaction of He with H2CO is so weak and anharmonic that the system fragments when using all the vibrational modes. To avoid fragmentation, in this case the three modes associated with the van der Waals interaction were neglected.

It is important to note the long range interactions for the two cases. For OH + He-H2CO collisions, the leading term is the strong dipole-dipole interaction, and for this reason the initial distance between reactants is set to 120 bohr, as in the OH + H2CO with no He. Accordingly, the maximum impact parameter is rather large and is calculated with a capture model70 depending on the collision energy. In the He + OH-H2CO case, however, the dispersion long range interaction is much weaker, and the initial distance was set to 50 bohr, and the maximum impact parameter of 20 bohr. The calculations have been performed at fixed collision energies and 104 trajectories were run in each case.

For OH + He-H2CO collisions, the examinated fragmentation channels are

H2COHe+OHH2COHe+OHInelasticH2CO+He+OHComplexdissociationH2CO+HeOHHeexchangeH2COOH+HeComplexformingHCO+He+H2OReaction. (4)

Complex dissociation and He-exchange are new rearrangement channels, but are directly linked to the reaction though they will reduce the probabilities of other channels. The two channels more relevant for the reactivity are the last two, the complex forming and the reaction. The cross sections and probabilities for each process are shown in Fig. 9, and compared with the QCT calculations performed for the H2CO + OH reaction with no He.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

QCT cross sections (bottom panel) and probability (top panel) for the processes of Eq. 4 in the He⋯ H2CO + OH collisions.

It can be seen that the reaction channel, in red, is reduced with respect to the case without He. The He exchange between H2CO and OH is also possible but is always smaller. The dominant channel below 0.1 eV of collision energy is the complex forming channel, in blue, whose cross section increases with decreasing collision energy. This channel indicates a very efficient energy exchange between OH and He.

In the He + OH-H2CO case, we can differentiate similar channels, namely

He+H2COOHH2COOH+HeInelasticH2CO+OH+HeComplexdissociationH2CO+HeOHHeexchangeH2COHe+OHComplexformingHCO+He+H2OReaction. (5)

Because the long range interactions are weaker in this system, all the cross sections are considerably lower than in the previous case. The reaction cross section to form HCO products increases slightly with decreasing collision energy, and is smaller than that obtained in the He⋯ H2CO + OH collisions. The fact that the cross sections for all processes in Fig. 10 increase with decreasing energy indicates that they are due to the formation of a complex in which there is an energy redistribution.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

QCT cross sections (bottom panel) and probability (top panel) for the processes of Eq. 5 in OH⋯ H2CO + He collision.

The contribution of He + H2CO⋯ OH and He⋯ H2CO + OH to the reactivity depends not only on the cross sections but also on the densities of the parent complexes, which are also connected through the collisions. Therefore a realistic simulation of the experimental conditions such as density of the different species, temperatures, etc., are required. Moreover, quantum effects are also expected to play an important role, as in the H2CO + OH collisions discussed above. For this reason we plan to perform a RPMD study of some of these reactive processes to shed light on these reactions.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we present a review for the Ring Polymer Molecular (RPMD) study of the reaction of OH with H2CO and CH3OH,42 showing the importance of the formation of very long-lived collision complex, COM-OH, below 100-200 K. These complexes live at least of the order of 0.1 μs, at 100 K, and it is expected to live even longer at lower temperatures. These long lifetimes are slightly shorter than average collision times at the conditions of the CRESU experiments (E. Jiménez, private communication) and supports the existence of pressure effects. However, the pure RPMD zero-pressure simulations42 are very close to the experimental data, suggesting that pressure effects do not strongly change the reactivity in these cases.

Since the most commonly used buffer gas in CRESU experiments is helium, we present a first dynamical study on the pressure effects. For this purpose, highly accurate potential energy surfaces (PESs) for He with all the reactants and products have been developed here. The PESs for the series of complexes involved (He-X, X = H2CO, HCO, H2O, OH), calculated at a uniform level of accuracy, show the anisotropy of interactions increasing with the system size. In particular, comparison of the He-X PES for X = H2CO and HCO together with X = CO has indicated appearance of additional minima from the latter to the former. In addition, a consistent stabilization of these complexes with subsequent addition of H atoms is predicted, apparently due to increasing polarity of the molecules. Besides, the He-H2CO PES features a lower anisotropy in the plane perpendicular to the molecule as compared to coplanar geometries, with the corresponding barriers between the two almost degenerate conformers, coplanar and axial (on the H side), different by a factor of two. In contrast, the situation is opposite for He-H2O.

The calculated IR intensity spectra are sensitive indicators of the complexation, manifesting it via new lines corresponding to the interactions of components. Three strong lines have been identified for the OH-H2CO complex, all dominated by the movements of OH. These spectra also reflect the strength of the interactions between the components, e.g., from weak lines for He-H2CO to strong lines for OH-H2CO. Still another factor is the mutual orientation of the components, affecting the relative line intensities for different modes of vibrations of one component relative to the other, such as of OH near H2CO. In particular, the O-H stretch is found to produce the strongest line, more than an order of magnitude more intense than for the isolated diatom.

The stability of the He-H2CO complexes is studied with the path integral molecular dynamics (PIMD) method, which allows to establish that these complexes are formed below 50 K. The OH-H2CO collision complexes, however, survive more than 0.1 μs below 100-200 K, suggesting that different complexes can play an important role depending on the temperature range.

In addition, QCT calculations for the He-H2CO + OH and OH-H2CO + He collisions have been performed in this work, as a first preliminary check of their role played in the reaction under multiple collision conditions, or pressure effects. In the He-H2CO + OH case, the reaction cross sections to form HCO + H2O are more than 10 times higher than in the OH-H2CO + He case at low collision energies. The reason is that long range dipole-dipole interaction is stronger as compared to the weak dispersion forces. Also, the OH-H2CO complex is more stable than the He-H2CO one, which thus may be broken more easily. For He-H2CO + OH, the OH-H2CO complex formation is facilitated by He, likely due to removal of excess kinetic energy and therefore stabilization of the complex, while the reaction leading to HCO + H2O is hindered. The importance of the interactions with He should apparently multiply for analogous processes in helium clusters and nanodroplets. In particular, the above mentioned OH-CH3OH complex was produced experimentally in a helium nanodroplet environment.55 The presently studied OH-H2CO could likely be formed in such a way as well.

Extending this study to all the processes and complexes may allow to perform a dynamical approach to pressure effects by calculating the individual collisional events and then solving the master equation to get the effective reaction rate constant. At the low temperatures of interest, below 100 K, quantum effects are important and should be included. Work in this direction, using the RPMD methodology is being done to analyze pressure effects.

In astrophysical environments the density is very low, and therefore only the zero-pressure reaction rate constants are of interest. The reviewed RPMD results in the zero-pressure limit are therefore important to show the increase of the rate below 100 K, very similar to the experimental results until ≈ 50 K for the two reactions studied. Since many reactions of COMs with OH have been reported, it is also very important to determine the effect of pressure on those measurements. Following the indications of the present results, these effects seem to be smaller than in the recent TST studies, and it is of paramount importance to analyze this problem in more detail.

Acknowledgement

We aknowledge Prof. Elena Jiménez for interesting discussion and providing us results prior to publication. PdM, AA, and OR acknowledge the support of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (SPAIN) under grant No. FIS2017-83473-C2 and from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 610256 (NANOCOSMOS). FN acknowledges the financial support of the UOIT and the NSERC of Canada (via a Discovery grant). YVS acknowledge the support of the European Regional Development Fund and the Republic of Cyprus through the Research Promotion Foundation (Project: INFRASTRUCTURE/1216/0070). The calculations have been performed at CESGA (finisterrae2), CENITS (lusitania2) and SCAYLE (calendula) supercomputer centers under RES (Red Española de Supercomputación) computational grant nos. AECT-2018-2-0001, AECT-2018-3-0001 and AECT-2019-1-0001.

References

  • (1).Herbst E, van Dishoeck EF. Complex Organic Interstellar Molecules. Annu Rev Astro Astrophys. 2009;47:427. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Snyder LE, Buhl D, Zuckerman B, Palmer P. Microwave detection of interstellar Formaldehyde. Phys Rev Lett. 1969;22:679. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Ball JA, Gottlieb CA, Lilley AE, Radford HE. Detection of Methyl Alcohol in Sagittarius. AstroPhys J. 1970;162:L203. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Gottlieb CA, Palmer P, Rickard LJ, Zuckerman B. Studies of Interstellar Formamide. Astrophys J. 1973;182:699–710. [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Godfrey PD, Brown RD, Robinson BJ, Sinclair MW. Discovery of Interstellar Methanimine (Formaldimine) AstroPhys lett. 1973;13:119. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Garrod R, Park IH, Caselli P, Herbest E. Are gas-phase models of interstellar chemistry tenable? The case of methanol. Faraday Discuss. 2006;133:51. doi: 10.1039/b516202e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Hudson RL, Moore MH. Laboratory Studies of the Formation of Methanol and Other Organic Molecules by Water+Carbon Monoxide Radiolysis: Relevance to Comets, Icy Satellites, and Interstellar Ices. Icarus. 1999;140:451. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Watanabe N, Mouri O, Nagaoka A, Chigai T, Kouchi A, Pirronello V. Laboratory simulation of competition between hydrogenation and photolysis in the chemical evolution of H2O-CO ice mixtures. AstroPhys J. 2007;668:1001. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Tielens AGGM, Hagen W. Model calculations of the molecular composition of interstellar grain mantles. Astron Astrophys. 1982;114:245. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Watanabe N, Kouchi A. Efficient Formation of Formaldehyde and Methanol by the Addition of Hydrogen Atoms to CO in H2O-CO Ice at 10 K. AstroPhys J. 2002;571:L173. [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Pontoppidan KM, van Dishoeck EF, Dartois E. Mapping ices in protostellar environments on 1000 AU scales. Methanol-rich ice in the envelope of Serpens SMM 4. Astron Astrophys. 2004;426:925. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Fuchs GW, Cuppen HM, Ioppolo S, Romanzin C, Bisschop SE, Andersson S, van Dishoeck EF, Linnartz H. Hydrogenation reactions in interstellar CO ice analogues- A combined experimental/theoretical approach. Astron Astrophys. 2009;505:629. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Remijan AJ, Hollis JM, Snyder LE, Jewell PR, Lovas FJ. Methyltriacetylene (CH3C6H) toward TMC-1: The Largest Detected Symmetric Top. Astrophys lett. 2006;643:L37–L40. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Bacmann A, Taquet V, Faure A, Kahane C, Ceccarelli C. Detection of complex organic molecules in a prestellar core: a new challenge for astrochemical models. Astron Astrophys. 2012;541:L12. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Roueff E, Gerin M, Jiménez-Escobar A, Muñoz Caro GM. Discovery of the Methoxy Radical, CH3O, toward B1: Dust Grain and Gas-phase Chemistry in Cold Dark Clouds. AstroPhys J lett. 2012;759:L43. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Vastel C, Ceccarelli C, Lefloch B, Bachiller R. The Origin of Complex Organic Molecules in Prestellar Cores. AstroPhys J lett. 2014;795:L2. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Bachiller R, Pérez Gutiérrez M. Shock Chemistry in the Young Bipolar Outflow L1157. AstroPhys J. 1997;487:L93–L96. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Mendoza E, Lefloch B, López-Sepulcre A, Ceccarelli C, Codella C, Boechat-Roberty HM, Bachiller R. Molecules with a peptide link in protostellar shocks: a comprehensive study of L1157. MNRAS. 2014;445:151–161. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Codella C, Fontani F, Ceccarelli C, Podio L, Viti S, Bachiller R, Benedettini M, Lefloch B. Astrochemistry at work in the L1157-B1 shock: acetaldehyde formation. MNRAS. 2015;449:L11–L15. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Guzmán VV, Pety J, Gratier P, Goicoechea JR, Gerin M, Roueff E, Le Petit F, Le Bourlot J. Chemical complexity in the Horsehead photodissociation region. Faraday Discussions. 2014;168:103–127. doi: 10.1039/c3fd00114h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Cuadrado S, Goicoechea JR, Cernicharo J, Fuente A, Pety J, Tercero B. Complex organic molecules in strongly UV-irradiated gas. Astron Astrophys. 2017;603:A124. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Cazaux S, Minissale M, Dulieu F, Hocuk S. Dust as interstellar catalyst. II. How chemical desorption impacts the gas. Astron Astrophys. 2016;585:A55. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Oba Y, Tomaru T, Lamberts T, Kouchi A, Watanabe N. An infrared measurement of chemical desorption from interstellar ice analogues. Nature Astronomy. 2018;2:228–232. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Cruz-Diaz GA, Martín-Doménech R, Muñoz-Caro GM, Chen Y-J. The negligible photodesorption of methanol ice and the active photon-induced desorption of its irradiation products. Astron Astrophys. 2016;592:68. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Bertin M, Romanzin C, Doronin M, Philippe L, Jeseck P, Ligterink N, Linnartz H, Michaut X, Fillion J-H. UV photodesorption of methanol in pure and CO-rich ices: desorption rates of the intact molecule and of the photofragments. AstroPhys J Lett. 2016;817:L12. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Shannon RJ, Blitz MA, Goddard A, Heard DE. Accelerated chemistry in the reaction between the hydroxil radical and methanol at interstellar temperatures facilitated tunnelling. Nature Chem. 2013;5:745. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Gómez-Martín JC, Caravan RL, Blitz MA, Heard DE, Plane JMC. Low temperature kinetics of the CH3OH + OH reaction. J Phys Chem A. 2014;118:2693. doi: 10.1021/jp5002995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Caravan RL, Shannon RJ, Lewis T, Blitz MA, Heard DE. Measurements of Rate Coefficients for Reactions of OH with Ethanol and Propan-2-ol at Very Low Temperatures. J Phys Chem A. 2015;119:7130. doi: 10.1021/jp505790m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Antiñolo M, Agúndez M, Jiménez E, Ballesteros B, Canosa A, Dib GE, Albadalejo J, Cernicharo J. Reactivity of OH and CH3OH between 22 and 64 K: modeling the gas phase production of CH3O in Barnard 1b. AstroPhys J. 2016;823:25. doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Ocaña AJ, Blázquez S, Potapov A, Ballesteros B, Canosa A, Antiñolo M, Vereecken L, Albaladejo J, Jiménez E. Gas-phase reactivity of CH3OH toward OH at interstellar temperatures (11.7-177.5 K): Experimental and theoretical study. PCCP. 2019;21:6942. doi: 10.1039/c9cp00439d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Shannon RJ, Taylor S, Goddard A, Blitz MA, Heard DE. Observation of a large negative temperature dependence for rate coefficients of reactions of OH with oxygenated volatile organic compounds studied at 86-112 K. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:13511. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00918k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Jimenez E, Antiñolo M, Ballesteros B, Canosa A, Albaladejo J. First evidence of the dramatic enhancement of the reactivity of methyl formate (HC(O)OCH3) with OH at temperatures of the interstellar medium: a gas-phase kinetic study between 22 K and 64 K. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:2183. doi: 10.1039/c5cp06369h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Ocaña AJ, Jiménez E, Ballesteros B, Canosa A, Antiñolo M, Albadalejo J, Agúdez M, Cernicharo J, Zanchet A, del Mazo P, Roncero O, et al. Is the gas phase OH+H2CO reaction a source of HCO in interstellar cold dark clouds? A kinetic, dynamics and modelling study. AstroPhys J. 2017;850:28. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93d9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Ocaña AJ, Blazquez S, Ballesteros B, Canosa A, Antiñolo M, Albaladejo J, Jimenez E. Gas phase kinetics of the OH + CH3CH2OH reaction at temperatures of the interstellar medium (T = 21-107 K) Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:5865. doi: 10.1039/c7cp07868d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Heard DE. Rapid Acceleration of Hydrogen Atom Abstraction Reactions of OH at Very Low Temperatures through Weakly Bound Complexes and Tunneling. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018;51:2620–2627. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Siebrand W, Smedarchina Z, Martínez-Núñez E, Fernández-Ramos A. Methanol dimer formation drastically enhances hydrogen abstraction from methanol by OH at low temperature. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:22712. doi: 10.1039/c6cp04173f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Gao LG, Zheng J, Fernández-Ramos A, Truhlar DG, Xu X. Kinetics of the Methanol Reaction with OH at Interstellar, Atmospheric, and Combustion Temperatures. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018;140:2906–2918. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Nguyen TL, Ruscic B, Stanton JF. A master equation simulation for the OH + CH3OH reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2019;150:084105. doi: 10.1063/1.5081827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Siebrand W, Smedarchina Z, Ferro-Costas D, Martínez-Núñez E, Fernández-Ramos A. Reply to the Comment on ”Methanol dimer formation drastically enhances hydrogen abstraction from methanol by OH at low temperature” by D. Heard, R. Shannon, J. Gomez Martin, R. Caravan, M. Blitz, J. Plane, M. Antiñolo, M. Agundez, E. Jimenez, B. Ballesteros, A. Canosa, G. El Dib, J. Albaladejo and J. Cernicharo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 8349. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:8355. doi: 10.1039/c8cp00519b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Zanchet A, del Mazo P, Aguado A, Roncero O, Jiménez E, Canosa A, Agúndez M, Cernicharo J. Full dimensional potential energy surface and low temperature dynamics of the H2CO + OH → HCO + H2O reaction. PCCP. 2018;20:5415. doi: 10.1039/c7cp05307j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Roncero O, Zanchet A, Aguado A. Low temperature reaction dynamics for CH3OH + OH collisions on a new full dimensional potential energy surface. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:25951. doi: 10.1039/c8cp04970j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).del Mazo-Sevillano P, Aguado A, Jiménez E, Suleimanov YV, Roncero O. Quantum Roaming in the Complex Forming Mechanism of the reactions of OH with Formaldehyde and Methanol at low temperature and zero pressure: a ring Polymer molecular dynamics approach. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10:1900. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Aguado A, Suarez C, Paniagua M. Accurate global fit of the H4 potential energy surface. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:4004. [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Tablero C, Aguado A, Paniagua M. Global nine-dimensional potential energy surface for the H5 system. II. Fit to an analytical expression. J Chem Phys. 1999;110:7796. [Google Scholar]
  • (45).MOLPRO is a package of ab initio programs designed by H. -J. Werner and P. J. Knowles and with contributions from, J. Almlöf and R. D. Amos and A. Berning and M. J. O. Deegan and F. Eckert and S. T. Elbert and C. Hampel and R. Lindh and W. Meyer and A. Nicklass and K. Peterson and R. Pitzer and A. J. Stone and P. R. Taylor and M. E. Mura and P. Pulay and M. Schütz and H. Stoll and T. Thorsteinsson and D. L. Cooper version 2012,
  • (46).Wheeler MD, Ellis AM. A new potential energy surface for He-H2CO. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;374:392. [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Lee H-S, McCoy A, Toczylowski R, Cybulski S. Theoretical studies of the X2Π and A 22Σ+ states of the He⋯OH and Ne⋯OH complexes. J Chem Phys. 2000;113:5736. [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Gubbels KB, Ma Q, Alexander MH, Dagdigian PJ, Tanis D, Groenen-boom GC, van der Avoird A, van de Meerakker SY. Resonances in rotationally inelastic scattering of OH(X2Π) with helium and neon. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:144308. doi: 10.1063/1.3697816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Kalugina Y, Lique F, Marinakis S. New ab initio potential energy surfaces for the ro-vibrational excitation of OH(X2Π) by He. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:13500. doi: 10.1039/c4cp01473a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Hou D, Ma Y-T, Zhang X-L, Li H. A full-dimension intra and inter-molecular ab initio potential energy surface and predicted infrared spectra for H2O-He. J Mol Spectrosc. 2016;330:217. [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Hodges M, Wheatley R, Harvey A. Intermolecular potential and second virial coefficient of the water-helium complex. J Chem Phys. 2002;116:1397. doi: 10.1063/1.1630960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Patkowski K, Korona T, Moszynski R, Jeziorski B, Szalewicz K. Ab initio potential energy surface and second virial coefficient for He-H22O complex. J Mol Struct (Theochem) 2002;591:231. [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Calderoni G, Cargnoni F, Raimondi M. An ab initio investigation of the He-H2O complex. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;370:233. [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Peterson KA, McBane GC. A hierarchical family of three-dimensional potential energy surfaces for He-CO. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:084314. doi: 10.1063/1.1947194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Hernandez FJ, Brice JT, Leavitt CM, Pino GA, Douberly GE. Infrared Spectroscopy of OH-CH3OH: Hydrogen-Bonded Intermediate Along the Hydrogen Abstraction Reaction Path. J Phys Chem A. 2015;119:8125. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b04875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Craig IR, Manolopoulos DE. Quantum statistics and classical mechanics: Real time correlation functions from ring polymer molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:3368. doi: 10.1063/1.1777575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Craig IR, Manolopoulos DE. Chemical reaction rates from ring polymer molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:084106. doi: 10.1063/1.1850093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Craig IR, Manolopoulos DE. A refined ring polymer molecular dynamics theory of chemical reaction rates. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:034102. doi: 10.1063/1.1954769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Suleimanov YV, Collepardo-Guevara R, Manolopoulos DE. Bimolecular reaction rates from ring polymer molecular dynamics: application to H + CH4 → H2 + CH3. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:044131. doi: 10.1063/1.3533275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Suleimanov YV, Aoiz FJ, Guo H. Chemical reaction rate coefficients from Ring polymer molecular dynamics: theory and practical applications. J Phys Chem A. 2016;120:8488. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b07140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Pérez de Tudela R, Aoiz FJ, Suleimanov YV, Manolopoulos DE. Chemical Reaction Rates from Ring Polymer Molecular Dynamics: Zero Point Energy Conservation in Mu + H2 → MuH + H. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012;3:493–497. doi: 10.1021/jz201702q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Pérez de Tudela R, Suleimanov YV, Richardson JO, Sáez Rábanos V, Green WH, Aoiz FJ. Stress Test for Quantum Dynamics Approximations: Deep Tunneling in the Muonium Exchange Reaction D + HMu → DMu + H. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2014;5:4219–4224. doi: 10.1021/jz502216g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Sivakumaran V, Hölscher D, Dillon T, Crowley JN. Reaction between OH and HCHO: temperature dependent rate coefficients (202-399 K) and product pathways (298 K) Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2003;5:4821. [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Wang S, Davidson DF, Hanson RK. High temperature measurements for the rate constants of C1-C4 aldehydes with OH in a shock tube. Proc Combust Inst. 2015;35:473. [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Ceriotti M, Manolopoulos DE. Efficient First-Principles Calculations of the Quantum Kinetic Energy and Momentum Distribution of Nuclei. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109:100604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.100604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Grozdanov TP, Solov’ev EA. Semiclassical quantisation of the hydrogen atom in crossed electric and magnetic fields. J Phys B. 1982;15:1195. [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Johnson BR. Semiclassical vibrational eigenvalues of H3+,D3+ and T3+ by the adiabatic switching method. J Chem Phys. 1987;86:1445. [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Qu C, Bowman JM. Revisiting adiabatic switching for initial conditions in quasi-classical trajectory calculations: application to CH4 . J Phys Chem A. 2016;120:4988. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b12701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Nagy T, Lendvay G. Adiatic Swithching extended to prepare semiclassically quantized rotational-vibrational initial states for Quas-classical trajectory calculations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:4621. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Levine RD, Bernstein RB. Molecular Reaction Dynamics and Chemical Reactivity. Oxford University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES