Table 8.

Estimates for moral decision to sacrifice pedestrians in Study 7.

Independent measure	OR	95% CI	p
Main effects
Decision-making mode (Intuitive vs. Deliberate)	0.71	0.65–0.79	<0.001
Perspective 1 (Passenger vs. Pedestrian)	2.87	2.57–3.21	<0.001
Perspective 2 (Observer vs. Pedestrian)	1.47	1.20–1.79	<0.001
Situational factors
Alternative default path	1.08	0.99–1.18	0.095
Number of passengers 1 (Two vs. One)	2.24	1.95–2.56	<0.001
Number of passengers 2 (Four vs. One)	4.59	4.08–5.16	<0.001
Number of pedestrians 1 (Two vs. One)	0.52	0.46–0.59	<0.001
Number of pedestrians 2 (Four vs. One)	0.21	0.19–0.23	<0.001
Child among passengers	1.50	1.37–1.65	<0.001
Child among pedestrians	0.66	0.60–0.72	<0.001
Norm violation of pedestrian	3.63	3.31–3.98	<0.001
Control variables
Female	0.95	0.86–1.06	0.374
Age	0.98	0.97–0.99	<0.001
Driver’s license	1.64	1.43–1.87	<0.001
Car use frequency	0.89	0.83–0.94	<0.001
Car ownership	0.81	0.76–0.87	<0.001
Education 1 (College vs. High School)	1.22	1.05–1.41	0.009
Education 2 (University vs. High School)	1.13	1.00–1.29	0.059
Region 1 (Suburb vs. City Center)	0.98	0.89–1.08	0.700
Region 2 (Countryside vs. City Center)	3.29	2.37–4.55	<0.001
Knowledge	1.16	1.01–1.34	0.042
Experience	0.55	0.46–0.67	<0.001
Presentation order	1.00	0.89–1.11	0.963
Text-based dilemma Personal	1.14	1.06–1.23	<0.001
Text-based dilemma Non-Personal	1.00	0.95–1.05	0.942
Model summary
Constant	0.41		<0.001
Observations	10,752
DF	25
Nagelkerke R2	0.34