Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep;157(3):692–704.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.007

Table 1.

Identified Polymorphisms Within the NS5B of the Phenotypes Samples

Patient no. Therapy Therapy outcome Assay outcome (SOF) Drug sensitivity
Relevant polymorphisms, % (pre→post therapy)
SOF IC50, μM RBV IC50, μM K100R A150V A150S G188D K206E T213N N244I
1 SOF/DAC/RBV SVR Sensitive 0.039 0.786 V (98)
2 SOF/VEL SVR Sensitive 0.034 0.545
3 SOF+OBV /PTV/RBV SVR Sensitive 0.011 0.419
4 SOF/DAC SVR Sensitive 0.054 0.19 E (98)
5 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Sensitive 0.06 0.43 E (99)
6 SOF/DAC/RBV Relapse Sensitive 0.033 0.886 E (99)
7 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Sensitive 0.04 0.72 V (98)
8 SOF/LDV Relapse Sensitive 0.02 0.701
9 SOF/DAC/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 R (65→98) S (98–99) D (98→97) N (98→99) I (94–99)
10 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 R (97→98) V (54–98) E (89→99)
11 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 V (98–95) E (98→99)
12 SOF/DAC/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 V (98–97) E (100→99)
13 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 V (98–99) E (98→99)
14 SOF/LDV/RBV Relapse Insensitive >0.25 >1.25 V (99)a E (100)a

NOTE. Patients were divided into 3 groups (SVR-sensitive, relapse-sensitive, and relapse-insensitive) based on therapy and assay outcomes. Samples were deemed to be SOF-insensitive if a single dose of the antiviral drug (0.25 μM) did not reduce the HCV RNA levels to <80% of the no-drug control in the capture fusion assay. Polymorphisms were identified by comparison of NS5b next-generation sequencing data from drug-sensitive vs drug-insensitive samples. The majority of the polymorphisms were identified in the assay-insensitive group, with a specific pattern (A150V and K206E) seen in patients 10–14. Percentage values indicate the frequency of each polymorphism present in the viral populations.

LDV, ledipasvir.

a

No post-treatment sequencing data were obtained for sample 14 due to low viral load post relapse.