Table 1.
Patient no. | Therapy | Therapy outcome | Assay outcome (SOF) | Drug sensitivity |
Relevant polymorphisms, % (pre→post therapy) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOF IC50, μM | RBV IC50, μM | K100R | A150V | A150S | G188D | K206E | T213N | N244I | ||||
1 | SOF/DAC/RBV | SVR | Sensitive | 0.039 | 0.786 | — | V (98) | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | SOF/VEL | SVR | Sensitive | 0.034 | 0.545 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | SOF+OBV /PTV/RBV | SVR | Sensitive | 0.011 | 0.419 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | SOF/DAC | SVR | Sensitive | 0.054 | 0.19 | — | — | — | — | E (98) | — | — |
5 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Sensitive | 0.06 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — | E (99) | — | — |
6 | SOF/DAC/RBV | Relapse | Sensitive | 0.033 | 0.886 | — | — | — | — | E (99) | — | — |
7 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Sensitive | 0.04 | 0.72 | — | V (98) | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | SOF/LDV | Relapse | Sensitive | 0.02 | 0.701 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | SOF/DAC/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | R (65→98) | — | S (98–99) | D (98→97) | — | N (98→99) | I (94–99) |
10 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | R (97→98) | V (54–98) | — | — | E (89→99) | — | — |
11 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | — | V (98–95) | — | — | E (98→99) | — | — |
12 | SOF/DAC/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | — | V (98–97) | — | — | E (100→99) | — | — |
13 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | — | V (98–99) | — | — | E (98→99) | — | — |
14 | SOF/LDV/RBV | Relapse | Insensitive | >0.25 | >1.25 | — | V (99)a | — | — | E (100)a | — | — |
NOTE. Patients were divided into 3 groups (SVR-sensitive, relapse-sensitive, and relapse-insensitive) based on therapy and assay outcomes. Samples were deemed to be SOF-insensitive if a single dose of the antiviral drug (0.25 μM) did not reduce the HCV RNA levels to <80% of the no-drug control in the capture fusion assay. Polymorphisms were identified by comparison of NS5b next-generation sequencing data from drug-sensitive vs drug-insensitive samples. The majority of the polymorphisms were identified in the assay-insensitive group, with a specific pattern (A150V and K206E) seen in patients 10–14. Percentage values indicate the frequency of each polymorphism present in the viral populations.
LDV, ledipasvir.
No post-treatment sequencing data were obtained for sample 14 due to low viral load post relapse.