Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 7;2019:6598637. doi: 10.1155/2019/6598637

Table 2.

Illustration of different device types used for interventional ASD device closure in both groups, technically challenging or special events occurring during cardiac catheter device closure procedures in both groups [significantly more events in the fluoroscopy group (p<0.001)] and illustration of intraprocedural complications and complications within 24 hours after procedure in both groups.

Variables Fluoroscopy Group TOE Group
(n = 238) (n = 159)
Device Types

Amplatzer™ Septal Occluder, n (%) 167 (72%) 125 (80%)
Solysafe™ Septal Occluder, n (%) 45 (20%) 0
CeraFlex™ ASD Occluder, n (%) 0 11 (7%)
GORE™ CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder, n (%) 4 (2%) 9 (6%)
pfm NitOcclud® ASD-R-Device, n (%) 5 (2%) 13 (8%)
BioSTAR™ Device, n (%) 8 (4%) 0
HELEX™ Septal Occluder, n (%) 3 (1%) 0

Technical Aspects

No event, n (%) 191 (80%) 149 (94%)
Two devices needed, n (%) 13 (5%) 0
Three devices needed, n (%) 2 (1%) 0
Missizing, n (%) 13 (6%) 5 (3%)
Device repositioning, n (%) 19 (8%) 4 (3%)
Equipment failure, n (%) 0 1 (1%)

Intraprocedural Complications

No complication, n (%) 230 (96.7%) 158 (99.4%)
Device embolization, n (%) 2 (0.8%) 1 (0.6%)
Heart rhythm disturbance, n (%) 6 (2.5%) 0

Postprocedural Complications within 24 hours

No complication, n (%) 230 (96.6%) 155 (97.5%)
Device embolization, n (%) 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.6%)
Heart rhythm disturbance, n (%) 2 (0.8%) 2 (1.3%)
Pericardial effusion, n (%) 2 (0.8%) 0
Vascular access related problems, n (%) 1 (0.4%) 0
Impairment of neighbouring cardiac structures, n (%) 2 (0.8%) 1 (0.6%)