Table 2.
New method |
Traditional methods |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Method A | Method B | Method C | ||
Corneal transparency | Declined slightly | Declined seriously | ||
Alignment of the stromal fibrils | Regular | Irregular | ||
Residual nuclei | No obvious | Obvious | ||
Thickening rate (%) | 204.90 ± 3.95 | 531.90 ± 7.93 | 410.30 ± 3.69 | |
p < 0.0001 (compared with method A) | ||||
Moisture content (%) | 91.80 ± 0.37 | 94.42 ± 0.25 | 94.04 ± 0.23 | |
p < 0.01 (compared with method A) | ||||
DNA clearance rate | About 98.67% | About 61.77% | About 91.65% | |
GAG content (ng/mg) | No significant changes (1.65 ± 0.05, p > 0.05) | Significant decreased | ||
(1.19 ± 0.11, p < 0.05) | (1.25 ± 0.08, p < 0.05) | |||
Mechanical properties | Young’s modulus | Significant increase | Significant decline | |
Tensile stress | Great in a short time | Weak in a long time |
GAG: glycosaminoglycan.