Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;4(11):14655–14662. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02204

Table 2. Comparison of Heat Conversion Efficiency of Various Cu2–xS Nanostructures.

plasmonic nanomaterials shape light sources power density (W/cm2) efficiency ref
Cu9S5 plate 980 nm laser 0.51 ∼25.7% (28)
Cu7.2S4 sphere 980 nm laser 0.29 56.7% (34)
Cu2–xS sphere 808 nm laser 2.3 16.3% (29)
CuS sphere 808 nm laser 1.0 31.4% (31)
Cu2–xS sphere 808 nm laser 1.0 27.6% (30)
Cu2–xS sphere 1064 nm laser 1.5 30.8% (30)
Cu9S8 dot 1064 nm laser 1.33 ∼49.0% this work
Cu9S8 dot and short rod 1064 nm laser 1.33 ∼45.1% this work
CuS nanorod 1064 nm laser 1.33 ∼36.6% this work
CuS nanorod 1064 nm laser 1.33 ∼34.9% this work