Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 16;23(15):6304–6314. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-15-06304.2003

Table 1.

Comparison of training and probe trial performance of CREB mutant mice in the water maze




All controls n = 38 one-way ANOVA Linea

All mutants n = 49 one-way ANOVA Lineb

Mutants excl CamKCre7 n = 37 one-way ANOVA Line

All animals n = 87 two-way ANOVA Genotypec

Genotype × selectivityd

All controls n = 38 mean ± SE

αΔ n = 10 mean ± SE

comp n = 13 mean ± SE

NesCre n = 14 mean ± SE

CamKCre7 n = 12 mean ± SE
Training
Escape latencye (sec) ns ns ns p<0.0007 ns 22.77 ± 1.07 27.17 ± 4.28 32.08 ± 2.85 31.06 ± 2.66 33.87 ± 3.91
Path length (m) ns ns ns p<0.0031 ns 5.00 ± 0.22 6.52 ± 0.93 7.60 ± 0.57 6.44 ± 0.51 6.38 ± 0.83
Search error (m × sec) ns ns ns p<0.0008 ns 12.09 ± 0.70 17.04 ± 3.31 20.90 ± 2.37 17.99 ± 2.13 19.48 ± 3.16
Wall hugging (%) ns ns ns p<0.0008 ns 8.52 ± 0.71 20.90 ± 6.46 28.14 ± 5.76 17.63 ± 3.71 18.19 ± 4.24
Probe trial 1
Percentage of time in trained quadrant ns p<0.0656 ns ns p<0.0234 35.78 ± 2.03 28.5 ± 2.11 26.39 ± 2.00 31.11 ± 3.70 40.87 ± 6.49
Percent time in trained zone ns p<0.0226 ns ns p<0.0121 24.58 ± 1.53 14.40 ± 2.24 14.49 ± 1.81 18.06 ± 3.53 28.12 ± 5.02
Crossing preference (x/m) ns p<0.0149 ns ns p<0.0016 0.19 ± 0.06 -0.01 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.05 0.16 ± 0.09 0.44 ± 0.16
Proximity (m) ns p<0.0346 ns ns p<0.0364 0.49 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.02 0.59 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.04 0.46 ± 0.04
Polar error (°) ns p<0.0368 ns ns p<0.0613 77.10 ± 2.71 84.03 ± 2.18 88.87 ± 2.95 84.06 ± 5.11 69.06 ± 7.36
Probe trial 2
Percent time in trained quadrant ns p<0.0628 ns ns p<0.0077 38.88 ± 2.49 32.83 ± 4.09 25.97 ± 2.25 34.78 ± 3.21 40.99 ± 5.56
Percent time in trained zone ns p<0.0502 ns ns p<0.0101 26.26 ± 1.97 19.13 ± 4.02 14.26 ± 1.94 21.88 ± 3.26 27.90 ± 4.33
Crossing preference (x/m) ns ns ns ns ns 0.22 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.11 0.10 ± 0.06 0.14 ± 0.11 0.41 ± 0.16
Proximity (m) ns ns ns ns p<0.0432 0.48 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.05 0.58 ± 0.03 0.51 ± 0.03 0.47 ± 0.04
Polar error (°)
ns
p<0.0408
ns
ns
p<0.0197
73.19 ± 3.13
83.33 ± 5.66
88.43 ± 3.29
77.52 ± 3.78
69.6 ± 6.04

ns, Not significant

a

αΔ + comp versus CamKCre7 versus NesCre

b

αΔ versus comp versus CamKCre7 versus NesCre

c

CREB deficient versus wild type

d

Forebrain selective (CamKCre7) versus whole NS (αΔ, comp, NesCre)

e

Escape latency and other training measures averaged over all acquisition trials