. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep 5;219(6):595.e1–595.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043

Table 4.

Estimated Cost Savings Associated with Statewide Scale Up of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project Model.

	Percent Using a LARC Method
	20%	30%	40%
Women aged 18–45 who are current MO Medicaid beneficiaries (n=132,058)^a
Unintended pregnancies avoided	10,431	16,250	19,978
Unintended births avoided	6,903	10,695	13,518
Estimated cost savings, 2013$	$79,712,958	$123,788,762	$156,769,168
Women enrolled in MO Women’s Health Services Program in 2011(n=61,297)
Unintended pregnancies avoided	4,199	6,813	9,833
Unintended births avoided	2,653	4,536	6,469
Estimated cost savings, 2013$	$29,289,520	$52,563,031	$75,339,232
Women aged 18–45 eligible for MO Women’s Health Services Program in 2011 (n=123,571)^a
Unintended pregnancies avoided	8,466	13,375	19,823
Unintended births avoided	5,348	9,145	13,040
Estimated cost savings, $2013	$59,045,880	$105,963,854	$151,879,280

LARC, Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive

Estimated using data from the 2009–13 Annual Community Survey