Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 1;23(5):1894–1902. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01894.2003

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Procedure and results of experiment 1.A, Protocol of the choice task with different reward quantities. In training, three types of trials were given in pseudorandom sequences: trials with a pair of identical blue beads (−, no reward), trials with a pair of yellow (1 or 6 pellets) and blue (−, no reward) beads, and trials with a pair of red (6 or 1 pellets) and blue (−, no reward) beads. The side of presentation was randomized. Chicks thus learned to choose a rewarding color (red or yellow) in the red/blue and the yellow/blue trials and not to peck beads in the blue/blue trials. Chicks were then tested in four trial types that were arranged randomly, i.e., blue/blue (20 trials), yellow/blue (5 trials), red/blue (5 trials), and red/yellow (10 trials). The side of presentation was also randomized. B, Number of choices in test trials with red/blue pair and yellow/blue pair; data obtained from the 6-vs-1 chicks (open columns), the 6-vs-6 chicks (filled columns), and the 1-vs-6 chicks (shaded columns). The number of choices per five trials was averaged over chicks. All of the chicks chose red or yellow;n denotes number of chicks. C, Proportion (percentage) of chicks that chose red was plotted along the 10 test trials with red/yellow pairs. Data were obtained from the 6-vs-1 chicks (open symbols), the 6-vs-6 chicks (filled symbols), and the 1-vs-6 chicks (shaded symbols). D, The number of choices of red was counted in the red/yellow test trials, averaged over chicks, and compared among 6-vs-1, 6-vs-6, and 1-vs-6 chicks; post hoc multiple comparisons between pairs among these three groups revealed significant differences at p < 0.001 (asterisks). Error bars denote SEM.