Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 1;23(7):2947–2960. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02947.2003

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Population responses to collinear and orthogonal Gabor arrays display comparable spread of activity. A, Example of optical imaging of population response for collinear (left) and orthogonal (right) arrays (stimulus spacing = 7.5°). Black arrows point to the response associated with the Gabor stimulus common to both configurations. The dashed box defines a ROI used to create activity profile in the direction of the white arrow; a dark gray line marks the V1/V2 border. Scale bar, 1 mm. B, Activity profiles for images inA (black solid lines) were fit with a multipeak Gaussian (gray dashed lines) made up of component Gaussians that correspond to individual Gabor representations (black dashed lines); arrows point to the peak of the common Gabor response. C, Peak-to-trough heights for collinear and orthogonal stimulus configurations spaced at either 7.5 or 10°; black bars signify the median of each distribution. D, The extent of activity for a Gabor stimulus when that stimulus was a member of an array versus when it was present as a SG stimulus. Leftgraphplots the extent of activity along the collinear axis for collinear versus SG; rightgraph plots the extent of activity along the orthogonal axis for orthogonal versus SG. The full width at half-height of the relevant component Gaussian was used as the measure of extent.