Skip to main content
. 2003 May 1;23(9):3689–3696. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03689.2003

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Motor recovery after experimental injury.A, The standard rotarod assay performance was expressed as the percentage of pretrauma latency. A repeated-measures ANOVA shows that overall rotarod performance is significantly worse in HO-2 KO mice compared with HO-2 wild-type mice. Post hoc analysis reveals that significant differences occur on days 7, 10, and 14. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (*p ≤ 0.05; Bonferroni t test). B, Motor coordination was tested on an inclined beam walking task. Performance was expressed as the ratio of foot faults of the contralateral hindlimb to the number of total steps, subtracted from 1. Motor recovery is significantly worse in HO-2 KO compared with HO-2 wild-type mice (ANOVA), specifically on day 7 after injury. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (*p ≤ 0.05; Bonferronit test).