Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0221899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221899

Exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) reduces contractile response of small airways from GSTCD-/- mice

Bo Liu 1, Amanda P Henry 1,*, Sheyda Azimi 1, Suzanne Miller 1, Frank K Lee 2, Jane C Lee 2, Kelly Probert 1, Michael I Kotlikoff 2, Ian Sayers 1, Ian P Hall 1
Editor: Saba Al Heialy3
PMCID: PMC6742219  PMID: 31513609

Abstract

Introduction

Genome-Wide Association Studies suggest glutathione S transferase C terminal domain (GSTCD) may play a role in development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. We aimed to define the potential role of GSTCD in airway inflammation and contraction using precision cut lung slice (PCLS) from wild-type (GSTCD+/+) and GSTCD knockout mice (GSTCD-/-).

Methods

PCLS from age and gender matched GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice were prepared using a microtome. Contraction was studied after applying either a single dose of Methacholine (Mch) (1 μM) or different doses of Mch (0.001 to 100 μM). Each slice was then treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or vehicle (PBS) for 24 hours. PCLS contraction in the same airway was repeated before and after stimulation. Levels of TNFα production was also measured.

Results

There were no differences in contraction of PCLS from GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice in response to Mch (EC50 of GSTCD+/+ vs GSTCD-/- animals: 100.0±20.7 vs 107.7±24.5 nM, p = 0.855, n = 6 animals/group). However, after LPS treatment, there was a 31.6% reduction in contraction in the GSTCD-/- group (p = 0.023, n = 6 animals). There was no significant difference between PBS and LPS treatment groups in GSTCD+/+ animals. We observed a significant increase in TNFα production induced by LPS in GSTCD-/- lung slices compared to the GSTCD+/+ LPS treated slices.

Conclusion

GSTCD knockout mice showed an increased responsiveness to LPS (as determined by TNFα production) that was accompanied by a reduced contraction of small airways in PCLS. These data highlight an unrecognised potential function of GSTCD in mediating inflammatory signals that affect airway responses.

Introduction

Genome-wide association study meta-analyses have identified associations between genetic variants located on Chromosome 4q24 and lung function parameters including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC)), as well as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [1–6]. Several genes sit at this locus, and the credible variant set includes variants in the glutathione S-transferase C-terminal containing domain (GSTCD) gene [4, 5, 7, 8]. Additional evidence supporting a potential role for this gene comes from expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data which show that increased GSTCD mRNA levels correlate with better lung function [8, 9]. GST genotypes have also been shown to be associated with the degree of hyper-responsiveness in adults with asthma [10].

GSTCD has a structural domain related to GSTs which themselves consist of three super families defined according to location (cytosol, mitochondrial and microsomal). Cytosolic GSTs possess more than 40% sequence homology and consist of 13 different classes based on their structure [7]. GST is best known for its enzymatic function in detoxification, breaking down the reduced form of glutathione contained in some toxins to xenobiotic substrates. GST can also function as a transport protein and has been shown to be involved in signal transduction pathways that control cell proliferation and death [11–14]. It is not known if GSTCD also possesses enzymatic activity in the respiratory system.

mRNA and protein expression studies in airway and lung tissue suggest that expression of GSTCD is ubiquitous in lung tissue [8]. It is found to be expressed most strongly in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs), both at the mRNA and protein level [8]. In addition, GSTCD protein expression was observed to be highest in the earlier stages of foetal development [15].

In this study, two different GSTCD knock-out mouse models were used to investigate phenotype correlations and specifically to look at methacholine (Mch)-induced contraction of small airways. This was examined in both wild-type (GSTCD+/+) and GSTCD knock-out (GSTCD-/-) mice using the precision cut lung slice (PCLS) technique to determine whether there are any changes in contractility of airways in GSTCD-/- mice. In addition, we studied the effect of a pro-inflammatory stimulus on these responses using pre-incubation with bacterial endotoxin LPS, which is associated with airway inflammation in diseases such as COPD [16–19].

Materials and methods

Animal work

All animal work was carried out under humane conditions, approved by the Cornell Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (USA) and adhered to the standards set out in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition 2011. Work in the UK was performed under Project licences PPL 40/3576 and P57452337.

Details of GSTCD-/- animals used for the work described in this paper can be found in the online (S1 Text) supporting information (See also S1 Fig and S2 Fig). Breeding and genotyping of the age and sex matched animals is also described in supporting information.

Study of contraction of small airways by use of PCLS

Preparation of mice lung slices

PCLS were prepared as previously described [20–22]. Briefly, age, sex, litter mate matched mice (one GSTCD+/+ mouse and one GSTCD-/- mouse) were sacrificed (aged between 50 and 57 days) by peritoneal injection of pentobarbital (0.3 ml per mouse). After confirmation of death, the lung and bronchus were exposed. A 20G mice bronchial tube was inserted and pre-prepared 2% low-temperature (1.2 ml) agarose was injected slowly through the tube. A final bolus of air (0.2 ml) was injected to push the agarose into the small airways and alveoli. The agarose in the lung was jellified by applying ice cold cotton over the lung for about 20 minutes. The lung was then put on ice to allow the agarose to set. Lobes were dissected in a petri dish filled with cold HBSS (Invitrogen) containing HEPES (20 mM) pH 7.4, then 20 slices each 150 μM thick were cut from the left lobe of each animal using an OTS-5000 microtome machine (Electron Microscopic Sciences, PA, and USA). The slices were incubated at 37°C for an hour in an incubator gassed with 5% CO2 and then washed in DMEM (Gibco) 3 times to remove agarose followed by an overnight incubation prior to contraction studies being performed.

Microscopic study of contraction of lung slices

PCLS were held in place by a slice anchor (Harvard Apparatus, UK) in a perfusion chamber mounted on the platform of an Inverted microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon, Japan). A range of concentrations of Mch (Sigma) dissolved in HBSS/HEPES buffer was delivered at a rate of 5ml per minute through an 8-channel perfusion system using a computer-controlled programme (EasyCode®, Automate Scientific): 0.4ml volumes surrounded the slice throughout the study. PCLS with intact structures and beating cilia were selected for contraction studies. Either single dose studies (three slices from each animal) or dose response studies (two slices from each animal) were performed. In the single dose study, a submaximal dose of Mch (1 μM) was perfused to the slice for five minutes after equilibration in HBSS/HEPES buffer at room temperature for 5 minutes. For dose response studies, different doses of Mch (0.001 to 100 μM) were delivered via different channels of the perfusion system (5 minutes for each dose) followed by a 10 minute wash with HBSS/HEPES buffer. Bright field images were taken by CCD camera on a microscope (Nikon Diaphot 300, Nikon) at a frame rate of 1 per 5 second using the SPOT programme (SPOT Imaging, Spot Advance Software, USA). Cross-section areas of bronchi were measured by pixel summing using image analysis software (ImageJ) [23, 24]. An averaged contraction from the last one minute of each perfusion period was calculated and thus the mean response calculated for each animal. Comparisons between GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice were made. Experiments were conducted with the investigator blind to genotype.

Incubation of PCLS with LPS

The effect of LPS from Escherichia coli O26:B6 (Sigma L2654) on contraction of PCLS was studied using both the single dose and dose-response protocols. Immediately after an initial contraction study, the slice was transferred into chambers containing HBSS/HEPES buffer with either LPS (10 μg/ml) or PBS and incubated for 24 hours. This concentration of LPS was selected based on a previous study on murine lung slices [18]. Contractile responses were studied post PBS or LPS stimulation. Differences in contractile responses before and after treatment were compared between GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice.

Determination of TNFα production following incubation of PCLS with LPS

Following 24 hours of incubation of PCLS with LPS, supernatant’s were collected and stored at -80°C. TNFα is a pro-inflammatory mediator known to be induced by LPS in the lung [18, 25–28]. The concentration of TNFα was measured using a murine TNFα Elisa kit (DY410-05, Duoset; R&D system Minneapolis, USA) as directed by the manufacturer. The levels of TNFα were compared among the different groups (6 slices in each group).

Statistics

Paired Student T-tests were performed in excel to compare the difference between groups. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

GSTCD expression in GSTCD+/+ mice

GSTCD expression was initially studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in GCTCD+/+ mouse lungs (Fig 1).

Fig 1. GSTCD protein expression indicates bronchial epithelial localisation as assessed by IHC in GSTCD+/+ C57BL/6N mouse lung tissue.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

Representative images of GSTCD expression with negative and isotype controls in lung tissue and positive control performed in kidney tissue. No staining is evident in either negative control (A-D). Predominant GSTCD staining in the lung indicates bronchial epithelial specificity in lung tissue and specific cells across the alveolar tissue (E, F, arrows indicate localised staining) and predicted positive control staining is seen in kidney tissue (G, H). Sections were stained with Proteintech antibody at 1:50 and images shown at x20 (A, C, E, G) and x40 (B, D, F, H) magnification. Analysis was performed on sections of paraffin embedded adult lung tissue age matched at 10 weeks. See also S2 Fig.

Phenotype of GSTCD-/- mice

GSTCD-/- mice were viable and showed no significant change in total mouse or lung weights between the GSTCD+/+ or GSTCD-/- animals (Fig 2).

Fig 2. GSTCD deletion does not affect total mouse or lung wet weight.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Whole body (A) and wet lung (B) median and range of weight in grams for 6 GSTCD+/+ mice, 6 Heterozygous GSTCD+/- mice and 6 GSTCD-/- mice.

GSTCD and LacZ staining in GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice

Positive anti-GSTCD antibody staining was observed in the +/+ mice (Fig 1 and S2 Fig), no staining was observed in the -/- mice (S2 Fig). GSTCD-/- mice showed strongest LacZ staining in the airways showing that GSTCD was knocked out (also shown in S2 Fig).

Non-respiratory phenotypes of GSTCD-/- mice

Data were interrogated from http://www.mousephenotype.org/data/genes/MGI:1914803#section-associations Phenotype abnormalities described in the IMPC GSTCD-/- mice include; increased or absent threshold for auditory brainstem response (p = 5x10-6), decreased mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (p = 4.55x10-5), decreased circulating alanine transaminase level (p = 9.5x10-5) and decreased startle reflex in both male and females (p = 0.0002) as well as increased spleen weight in males (one out of 13 animals) and decreased lean body mass in females (p = 1.49x10-5), all compared to the GSTCD+/+ animals. No baseline respiratory abnormalities were recorded.

Comparison of contraction between GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice

Contractility of mice airways was compared between GSTCD-/- mice and GSTCD+/+ age and sex matched litter mate mice. Lung slices with epithelial integrity proven by cilia beating and a good test response to Mch were subjected to either single doses of Mch (1 μM, 3 slices for each mouse) or dose dependent responses (0.001–100μM, 2 slices for each mouse). We observed no differences in either maximum contractility to a single dose 1μM of Mch (Fig 3A) or in dose-response curves between GSTCD-/- mice and GSTCD+/+ mice (Fig 3B) and EC50 (Fig 3C) (both p<0.05, n = 12–18 slices from 6 animals per group).

Fig 3. GSTCD deletion does not influence Methacholine induced contraction in PCLS.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

Peak percentage contraction of airways (A) comparison of dose-response curves (B), and EC50 (C) between GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice. Dose-response curves were created by applying different concentration of Mch (0.001 to 100 μM), each concentration for 5 min and averaged contraction during the final minute of each addition was calculated. Data are means from n = 6 animals in each group; 2–3 slices were studied from each animal.

Comparison of contractility of airways following LPS treatment

Given the potential involvement of GSTCD homologues in inflammatory signalling we next examined contractility following LPS treatment of GSTCD-/- and GSTCD+/+ lung slices. Initial experiments demonstrated that there was a small reduction (<10%) in contractile responses to a sub maximum dose of Mch (1uM) following 24 hours incubation of GSTCD+/+ PCLS in the absence of LPS, possibly related to background release of mediators from slices. In GSTCD+/+ mice (Fig 4A and 4B), this reduction appeared larger when LPS was included in the media during the 24h incubation period although this difference was not significant. However, there was increased reduction of contraction of airways in GSTCD-/- mice (Fig 4C and 4D) following LPS pre-treatment in response to challenge with 1uM Mch. Fig 4D shows representative images of airways stimulated with Mch (1μM) before and after LPS challenge. The difference between PBS and LPS treated groups of slices was significant (4.7% vs 32.8%, p<0.05, slices from n = 6 animals) (Fig 4F). There was no shift in the GSTCD+/+ PCLS dose-response curves to Mch (Fig 5A), however a rightwards shift in PCLS from the LPS-treated group of GSTCD-/- mice was observed (Fig 5B). EC50 values were not significantly different as follow: PBS-treated 123±27nM (GSTCD+/+) and 135±54nM (GSTCD-/-); LPS-treated 139±34nM (GSTCD+/+) and 258±76nM (GSTCD-/-), all n = 6, p>0.05.

Fig 4. LPS treatment leads to contractile responses only in the GSTCD deleted PCLS.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

Lung slices were prepared from GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice. (A) And (B) comparison of time courses of averaged contraction of slices in GSTCD+/+ following either PBS or LPS treatment. (C) And (D) comparison of time courses of averaged contraction of slices in GSTCD-/- following either PBS or LPS treatment. (E) Representative airway in GSTCD+/+ (upper row) and GSTCD-/- (lower row) stimulated by Mch (1 μM) before and after LPS treatment. Images of airways were taken following a 5-minute incubation of drugs and control (in absence of Mch). (F) Comparison of % decrease of contractility of airways before and after LPS treatment in GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- groups. * Compared between LPS in GSTCD+/+ PCLS and GSTCD-/- PCLS P <0.05.

Fig 5. Dose response of airways to Methacholine shows a decreased contractility in GSTCD-/- mouse lungs following LPS treatment.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

Dose-response curves were produced (A) GSTCD+/+ (B) GSTCD-/- by applying different doses of Mch (0.001 to 100 μM) to the slices for five minutes. Percentage contraction of airways during the last minute from 2 or 3 slices each animal was averaged and a total of 6 animals in each group were compared. In the GSTCD-/- group dose-response curves were right-shifted. *P <0.05 compared with the same concentration following LPS treatment.

LPS treatment induces higher TNFα production in PCLS GSTCD-/- mice

To further assess possible mechanisms underlying the effect of GSTCD genotype on LPS pre-treatment on contractile signalling, we studied the release of TNFα, a pro-inflammatory mediator known to be induced by LPS in the lung. Following 24h LPS treatment, there was a marked increase of TNFα release in slices from both GSTCD+/+ mice and GSTCD-/- mice in comparison to the PBS treated group (Fig 6). However, there was a greater increase of TNFα production in PCLS from GSTCD-/- when compared to GSTCD+/+ mice following LPS treatment. Basal levels of TNFα release also appeared higher in the GSTCD-/- slices, although this difference was not statistically significant. In order to further study the possible contribution of TNFα to the decreased contraction of airway in GSTCD knockout mice, we compared the percentage decrease of contractility of airways which were subjected to 24 hours of treatment of TNFα between GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice. Incubation with TNFα (10 ng/ml) showed no effects on contraction of airways in GSTCD+/+ mice. However, there was a small decrease in contractility of airways both in untreated and following 24 hours of TNFα treatment in GSTCD-/- mice (38±6%, n = 6) suggesting TNFα may at least partially mediate the decreased contractility of airways seen in GSTCD-/- mice after LPS stimulation, although this difference was not significant.

Fig 6. TNFα release from GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- airways before or after LPS (10 μg/ml) treatment.

Fig 6

Open in a new tab

Supernatants following either PBS or LPS treatment were collected and concentration of TNFα (pg/ml) was measured using ELISA. *P<0.01, n = 18–20 supernatants from 6 mice.

Discussion

In this study, we set out to try and explore the potential role of GSTCD in the control of airway responses using PCLS from transgenic mouse models. Given genetic data implying a potential role for GSTCD in the control of lung function [10], gaining a clear understanding of the function of GSTCD would be valuable. To do this we compared the difference of contractility of small airways from GSTCD-/- and GSTCD+/+ mice. Under non-inflammatory conditions, airways from GSTCD-/- mice behaved similarly to airways from GSTCD+/+ mice. However, airways prepared from the lungs of GSTCD-/- mice showed reduced contractility in an inflammatory environment created by incubation of PCLS with LPS, suggesting GSTCD may regulate LPS-induced airway inflammation and hence potentially airway contraction in patients under inflammatory conditions such as those in the context of infective exacerbations of asthma or COPD.

Using two different GSTCD-/- models we also explored the phenotype of these animals in more detail. The mice are viable, and show no obvious differences in terms of breeding success or other major abnormalities. Data from IMPC show that GSTCD-/- mice have increased spleen weight in males, decrease lean body mass in females, decreased circulating phosphate levels and decreased startle reflexes in both male and females compared to the GSTCD+/+ animals. Our data show no obvious differences in terms of lung development or overall body weight between GSTCD-/- and GSTCD+/+ mice.

Currently the pathophysiological role of GSTCD in asthma or COPD is not fully understood. The genetic association studies and eQTL data show association between variants associated with increased mRNA for GSTCD and better lung function, and hence it is possible that genetic variants which alter GSTCD expression may underlie the associations seen in population studies. GSTCD is expressed in structural cells in the respiratory system including airway smooth muscle cells and bronchial epithelium [8, 29]. GSTCD has significant homology with other GST proteins which are important in controlling redox states in the lung [30, 31]. GSTM1 and GSTT1 have also found to be associated with control of airway hyper-responsiveness, and GSTP1 has been found to prevent LPS-induced inflammation and play an anti-inflammatory role in the response to LPS by inhibiting LPS-induced mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [32, 33]. However, GSTCD lacks the key functional domains believed to be important for these activities. It therefore remains unclear if the association of GSTCD with lung function is connected with the enzymatic function possessed more generally by the GST family.

In addition, a protein homology search also revealed homology between GSTCD and chloride intracellular channels (CLICs) 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, suggesting an alternative mechanism whereby GSTCD could contribute to control of airway contraction. A recent study from our group has demonstrated that CLICs play a role in Ca2+ homeostasis in the airways, with CLIC1 contributing to the modulation of cAMP-induced whole cell currents in human bronchial epithelial cells [34]. Hence it is possible that the effects of GSTCD on airways are mediated via altered Cl- channel activity. In keeping with this suggestion it has been shown that some other GSTs can also modulate CLIC channel activity [30, 31, 35].

In the current study we found that incubation of lung slices with LPS in GSTCD-/- reduced contractility compared with the response seen in GSTCD+/+ mice Interestingly, in GSTCD+/+ mice we found that pre-incubation with LPS did not alter small airway contractility in lung slices: these findings are in keeping with some previous observations [18]. The observation that contractility of airways was reduced in GSTCD-/- mouse lung slices suggests that GSTCD may play a role in maintaining contractile signalling per se. This however does not explain the eQTL data which show variants associated with lower levels of GSTCD expression and better lung function.

To further investigate the potential role of GSTCD in control of inflammatory signalling in the airways we went on to study TNFα production in lung slices. LPS binds to and activates Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) depending on the type of LPS which leads to activation of pro-inflammation pathways such as myeloid differentiation factor /NFκB, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and MAPKs [18, 36–39]. Activation of TH2 cells will also lead to release of other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1β. In our study we found that following treatment with LPS there was a marked increase in TNFα release in both GSTCD+/+ and GSTCD-/- mice. In addition, LPS induced TNFα release was significantly higher in PCLS from GSTCD-/- mice, and although not significant there was a trend towards increased TNFα release in unstimulated PCLS as well. This shows that reduced contractility in GSTCD slices treated with LPS is associated with enhanced TNFα release. Therefore we examined the effect of direct TNFα application on lung slices: whilst we saw some reduction in contractility in PCLS from GSTCD-/- mice after pre-incubation with TNFα this could not explain the whole of the difference in LPS induced responses seen between GSTCD-/- and GSTCD+/+ PCLS suggesting additional mechanisms must also contribute. Interestingly, previous work has shown that contractile responses by themselves can regulate NFkB activation which can in turn lead to altered TNFα production providing a further way in which the degree of contraction can influence mediator release and subsequent responses [40]. In addition, there is evidence that TNFα may produce a reduced contractile response in PCLS (as opposed to isolated airway myocytes where enhanced Ca2+ responses are seen following TNFα pre-incubation) through regulation of NMDA-R mediated responses [41].

In summary, using PCLS, we have shown that GSTCD-/- mice show an increased responsiveness to LPS (as determined by TNFα production) that was accompanied by a reduced contraction of small airways. These data potentially highlight an unrecognised function of GSTCD in mediating inflammatory signals that affect airway calibre, and may in part underlie the genetic associations seen at the GSTCD locus with lung function and COPD phenotypes.

Supporting information

S1 Text. Supporting information.

Generation of the mouse model and methods used to genotype the animals.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (17.1KB, docx)
S1 Fig. GSTCD knockout cassette and region on chromosome 4q24.

(A) The Promoter driven cassette used to produce the knockout mouse and (B) the region of GSTCD sequences (5’ arm and 3’ arm) inserted into the cassette to make it gene specific on Chromosome 3 GRCm38.p1 C57BL/6J accession number NM_080507.

(JPG)

Click here for additional data file. (74.1KB, jpg)
S2 Fig. Immunohistochemical analysis of GSTCD-/- mouse.

The lung sections show control (no antibody) and stained with anti-GSTCD antibody respectively (A and B) show GSTCD+/+ and (C and D) GSTCD-/- lungs. (E) Xgal staining in GSTCD-/- lung for LacZ expression. Scale bar– 200 μm.

(JPG)

Click here for additional data file. (157.2KB, jpg)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by a Medical Research Council (www.MRC.ac.uk) programme grant (G1000861). IPH is also in receipt of a National Institute for Health Research (www.nihr.ac.uk) senior investigator award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Brehm JM, Man Tse S, Croteau-Chonka DC, Forno E, Litonjua AA, Raby BA, et al. A Genome-Wide Association Study of Post-bronchodilator Lung Function in Children with Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(5):634–7. Epub 2015/09/02. 10.1164/rccm.201501-0047LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castaldi PJ, Cho MH, Litonjua AA, Bakke P, Gulsvik A, Lomas DA, et al. The association of genome-wide significant spirometric loci with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45(6):1147–53. Epub 2011/06/11. 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0055OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hancock DB, Eijgelsheim M, Wilk JB, Gharib SA, Loehr LR, Marciante KD, et al. Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):45–52. Epub 2009/12/17. 10.1038/ng.500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Repapi E, Sayers I, Wain LV, Burton PR, Johnson T, Obeidat M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with lung function. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):36–44. Epub 2009/12/17. 10.1038/ng.501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soler Artigas M, Wain LV, Repapi E, Obeidat M, Sayers I, Burton PR, et al. Effect of five genetic variants associated with lung function on the risk of chronic obstructive lung disease, and their joint effects on lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(7):786–95. Epub 2011/10/04. 10.1164/rccm.201102-0192OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang J, Zhou H, Liang B, Xiao J, Su Z, Chen H, et al. Association of five genetic variants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility and spirometric phenotypes in a Chinese Han population. Respirology. 2014;19(2):262–8. Epub 2013/11/30. 10.1111/resp.12212 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levinsson A, Olin AC, Modig L, Dahgam S, Bjorck L, Rosengren A, et al. Interaction effects of long-term air pollution exposure and variants in the GSTP1, GSTT1 and GSTCD genes on risk of acute myocardial infarction and hypertension: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99043 Epub 2014/06/11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Obeidat M, Miller S, Probert K, Billington CK, Henry AP, Hodge E, et al. GSTCD and INTS12 regulation and expression in the human lung. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74630 Epub 2013/09/24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hao K, Bossé Y, Nickle DC, Paré PD, Postma DS, Laviolette M, et al. Lung eQTLs to Help Reveal the Molecular Underpinnings of Asthma. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(11):e1003029 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003029 PMC3510026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bowatte GA, Lodge C, Erbas B, Lowe A, Dennekamp M, Abramson MJ, et al. GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTCD Polymorphisms and Traffic-Related Air Pollution as Interactive Risk Factors for Childhood and Adolescence Asthma, Wheeze and Eczema. Am J respir Crit Care Mad. 2105;191:A6458. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chaubey N, Ghosh SS. Molecular cloning, purification and functional implications of recombinant GST tagged hGMCSF cytokine. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(5):1713–26. Epub 2013/01/22. 10.1007/s12010-012-0052-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hatton T, Pendleton N, Barraclough R, Green J. Expression of glutathione-s-transferase (gst) subtypes in resected lung-tumors—relationship to histological type and proliferation indexes. Int J Oncol. 1993;3(5):881–6. Epub 1993/11/01. 10.3892/ijo.3.5.881 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Makino T, Ishikawa K, Igarashi I, Yamoto T, Manabe S, Nakayama H. Relationship between GST Yp induction and hepatocyte proliferation in rats treated with phase II drug metabolizing enzyme inducers. Toxicol Pathol. 2008;36(3):420–7. Epub 2008/04/29. 10.1177/0192623308315359 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nakajima S, Ohsawa I, Ohta S, Ohno M, Mikami T. Regular voluntary exercise cures stress-induced impairment of cognitive function and cell proliferation accompanied by increases in cerebral IGF-1 and GST activity in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2010;211(2):178–84. Epub 2010/03/24. 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Me Obeidat, Miller S, Probert K, Billington CK, Henry AP, Hodge E, et al. GSTCD and INTS12 Regulation and Expression in the Human Lung. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(9):e74630 10.1371/journal.pone.0074630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bigliani MC, Rossetti V, Grondona E, Lo Presti S, Paglini PM, Rivero V, et al. Chemical compositions and properties of Schinus areira L. essential oil on airway inflammation and cardiovascular system of mice and rabbits. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(7):2282–8. Epub 2012/05/02. 10.1016/j.fct.2012.04.025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brandolini L, Asti C, Ruggieri V, Intilangelo A, Pellegrini L, Chiusaroli R, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in mice. II. Evaluation of functional damage in isolated parenchyma strips. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2000;13(2):71–8. Epub 2000/05/09. 10.1006/pupt.2000.0232 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Donovan C, Royce SG, Vlahos R, Bourke JE. Lipopolysaccharide does not alter small airway reactivity in mouse lung slices. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0122069–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122069 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Royce SG, Nold MF, Bui C, Donovan C, Lam M, Lamanna E, et al. Airway Remodeling and Hyperreactivity in a Model of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Their Modulation by IL-1 Receptor Antagonist. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2016;55(6):858–68. Epub 2016/08/03. 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0031OC . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hiorns JE, Bidan CM, Jensen OE, Gosens R, Kistemaker LE, Fredberg JJ, et al. Airway and Parenchymal Strains during Bronchoconstriction in the Precision Cut Lung Slice. Front Physiol. 2016;7:309 Epub 2016/08/26. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim HJ, Kim Y, Park SJ, Bae B, Kang HR, Cho SH, et al. Airway Smooth Muscle Sensitivity to Methacholine in Precision-Cut Lung Slices (PCLS) from Ovalbumin-induced Asthmatic Mice. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015;19(1):65–71. Epub 2015/01/22. 10.4196/kjpp.2015.19.1.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosner SR, Ram-Mohan S, Paez-Cortez JR, Lavoie TL, Dowell ML, Yuan L, et al. Airway contractility in the precision-cut lung slice after cryopreservation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50(5):876–81. Epub 2013/12/10. 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0166MA [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hecker D, Kappler J, Glassmann A, Schilling K, Alt W. Image analysis of time-lapse movies—a precision control guided approach to correct motion artefacts. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;172(1):67–73. Epub 2008/05/27. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Strandberg S, Wretling ML, Wredmark T, Shalabi A. Reliability of computed tomography measurements in assessment of thigh muscle cross-sectional area and attenuation. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:18 Epub 2010/08/13. 10.1186/1471-2342-10-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oyoshi MK, Bryce P, Goya S, Pichavant M, Umetsu DT, Oettgen HC, et al. TNF receptor-associated factor 1 expressed in resident lung cells is required for the development of allergic lung inflammation. J Immunol. 2008;180(3):1878–85. Epub 2008/01/23. 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1878 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trifilieff A, Walker C, Keller T, Kottirsch G, Neumann U. Pharmacological profile of PKF242-484 and PKF241-466, novel dual inhibitors of TNF-alpha converting enzyme and matrix metalloproteinases, in models of airway inflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135(7):1655–64. Epub 2002/04/06. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verheggen MM, van Hal PT, Adriaansen-Soeting PW, Goense BJ, Hoogsteden HC, Brinkmann AO, et al. Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor expression in human bronchial epithelial cell lines by IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha and LPS. Eur Respir J. 1996;9(10):2036–43. Epub 1996/10/01. 10.1183/09031936.96.09102036 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zerfaoui M, Naura AS, Errami Y, Hans CP, Rezk BM, Park J, et al. Effects of PARP-1 deficiency on airway inflammatory cell recruitment in response to LPS or TNF: differential effects on CXCR2 ligands and Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86(6):1385–92. Epub 2009/09/11. 10.1189/jlb.0309183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kheirallah AK, de Moor CH, Faiz A, Sayers I, Hall IP. Lung function associated gene Integrator Complex subunit 12 regulates protein synthesis pathways. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):248 Epub 2017/03/25. 10.1186/s12864-017-3628-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Littler DR, Assaad NN, Harrop SJ, Brown LJ, Pankhurst GJ, Luciani P, et al. Crystal structure of the soluble form of the redox-regulated chloride ion channel protein CLIC4. FEBS J. 2005;272(19):4996–5007. Epub 2005/09/24. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04909.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Littler DR, Harrop SJ, Brown LJ, Pankhurst GJ, Mynott AV, Luciani P, et al. Comparison of vertebrate and invertebrate CLIC proteins: the crystal structures of Caenorhabditis elegans EXC-4 and Drosophila melanogaster DmCLIC. Proteins. 2008;71(1):364–78. Epub 2007/11/07. 10.1002/prot.21704 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mapp CE, Fryer AA, De Marzo N, Pozzato V, Padoan M, Boschetto P, et al. Glutathione S-transferase GSTP1 is a susceptibility gene for occupational asthma induced by isocyanates. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(5):867–72. Epub 2002/05/08. 10.1067/mai.2002.123234 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spiteri MA, Bianco A, Strange RC, Fryer AA. Polymorphisms at the glutathione S-transferase, GSTP1 locus: a novel mechanism for susceptibility and development of atopic airway inflammation. Allergy. 2000;55 Suppl 61:15–20. Epub 2000/08/05. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00502.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu B, Billington CK, Henry AP, Bhaker SK, Kheirallah AK, Swan C, et al. Chloride intracellular channel 1 (CLIC1) contributes to modulation of cyclic AMP-activated whole-cell chloride currents in human bronchial epithelial cells. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(2). Epub 2018/01/26. 10.14814/phy2.13508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dulhunty A, Gage P, Curtis S, Chelvanayagam G, Board P. The glutathione transferase structural family includes a nuclear chloride channel and a ryanodine receptor calcium release channel modulator. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(5):3319–23. Epub 2000/10/18. 10.1074/jbc.M007874200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Freitag A, Reimann A, Wessler I, Racke K. Effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) on rat tracheal epithelial cells in culture: morphology, proliferation and induction of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. Pulm Pharmacol. 1996;9(3):149–56. Epub 1996/06/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Honda K, Wada H, Nakamura M, Nakamoto K, Inui T, Sada M, et al. IL-17A synergistically stimulates TNF-alpha-induced IL-8 production in human airway epithelial cells: A potential role in amplifying airway inflammation. Exp Lung Res. 2016;42(4):205–16. Epub 2016/06/09. 10.1080/01902148.2016.1190796 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moreland JG, Fuhrman RM, Wohlford-Lenane CL, Quinn TJ, Benda E, Pruessner JA, et al. TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta are not essential to the inflammatory response in LPS-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;280(1):L173–80. Epub 2001/01/03. 10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.1.L173 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morello S, Ito K, Yamamura S, Lee KY, Jazrawi E, Desouza P, et al. IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha regulation of the adenosine receptor (A2A) expression: differential requirement for NF-kappa B binding to the proximal promoter. J Immunol. 2006;177(10):7173–83. Epub 2006/11/04. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7173 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Anaparti V, Pascoe CD, Jha A, Mahood TH, Ilarraza R, Unruh H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor regulates NMDA receptor-mediated airway smooth muscle contractile function and airway responsiveness. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;311(2):L467–80. Epub 2016/07/03. 10.1152/ajplung.00382.2015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alcorn JF, Ckless K, Brown AL, Guala AS, Kolls JK, Poynter ME, et al. Strain-dependent activation of NF-kappaB in the airway epithelium and its role in allergic airway inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010;298(1):L57–66. Epub 2009/11/10. 10.1152/ajplung.00037.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Text. Supporting information.

Generation of the mouse model and methods used to genotype the animals.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (17.1KB, docx)
S1 Fig. GSTCD knockout cassette and region on chromosome 4q24.

(A) The Promoter driven cassette used to produce the knockout mouse and (B) the region of GSTCD sequences (5’ arm and 3’ arm) inserted into the cassette to make it gene specific on Chromosome 3 GRCm38.p1 C57BL/6J accession number NM_080507.

(JPG)

Click here for additional data file. (74.1KB, jpg)
S2 Fig. Immunohistochemical analysis of GSTCD-/- mouse.

The lung sections show control (no antibody) and stained with anti-GSTCD antibody respectively (A and B) show GSTCD+/+ and (C and D) GSTCD-/- lungs. (E) Xgal staining in GSTCD-/- lung for LacZ expression. Scale bar– 200 μm.

(JPG)

Click here for additional data file. (157.2KB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES