Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug 9;94(9):1814–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.031

Table 2.

Groningen Radiation-Induced Xerostomia Questionnaire Baseline and AUC Scores for Patients Receiving Placebo vs NAC

Scoresa
Total AUC During RT
Baseline (Cycle 0)
(All Cycles)
Post RT at 3 mo
Characteristics Placebo NAC P Valueb Placebo NAC P Valueb,c Placebo NAC P Valueb
Sticky saliva
 Daytime 11.1 6.5 .38 45.2 26.1 .04 50.0 35.2 .40
 Nighttime 8.9 5.6 .87 34.5 29.1 .56 55.6 22.2 .24
 Total 10.2 6.1 .55 40.9 27.2 .12 51.9 30.9 .29
Xerostomia
 Daytime 15.9 13.9 .58 44.1 27.3 .02 46.3 29.6 .59
 Nighttime 29.6 20.4 .44 39.8 31.3 .22 36.1 27.8 .76
 Total 20.5 16.0 .40 43.8 28.5 .02 42.2 28.9 .65

Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; NAC = N-acetylcysteine; RT = radiotherapy.

a

Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

b

Calculated with equal variance t testing.

c

Bold indicates statistical significance.