Table 2.
Study subgroup comparisons
Comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Studies Compared | md | CI − | CI + | Z | P | |
1 | 2 | ||||||
Substance | CBT +SUB | Chan2004, Dutton1997 | −2.14 | −3.20 | −1.08 | −3.96 | <.001 |
Abuse | Easton 2007 | Lawson2009 | |||||
Augmented |
Stover2011 MI + SUB Mbilinyi2011 Stuart2013 Schumacher2011 |
Lila2018, Morell2003, Murphy2017, Taft2013/15 |
|||||
MI+SUB | CBT+SUB | 1.94 | 0.41 | 3.48 | 2.48 | <.05 | |
CBT + MI | CBT +SUB | 3.83 | 1.89 | 5.77 | 3.86 | <.01 | |
CBT + SUB | CBT | −2.45 | −4.12 | −0.77 | −2.87 | <.01 | |
Trauma | Taft2013 | Chan2004, Dutton1997 | −1.47 | −2.63 | −.30 | −2.47 | <.001 |
Augmented | Taft2015 |
Easton 2007,Murphy2017 Morell2003,Lawson2009 Lila2018,Mbilinyi2011 Stuart2013 Stover2011 Schumacher2011 |