Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 9.
Published before final editing as: Cell Immunol. 2018 Oct 9:S0008-8749(18)30440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.09.007

Table 1 :

Summary of Approaches to Intravital Lung Imaging

Approach Methodology Pros/Cons Well-suited for Immune Study Animal Models Studied Key References
1 Bronchus Clamping Bronchus of one lobe is clamped preventing airflow induced motion Pros: a) Minimal motion artifacting
   b) Relatively simple surgical preparation
Cons: a) Imaged lobe is subjected to severe hypoxia
   b) Only short imaging duration achievable
No Rabbit, Cat, Dog, Mouse 1) H. L. Hall, Am. J. Physiol. 72, 446–457 (1925).
2) R. G. Macgregor, J. Physiol. 80, 65–77 (1933)
3) A. Hasegawa, K. Hayashi, et al., J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 461–468.e6 (2010).
2 Prolonged Apnea Image capture restricted to the expiratory plateau which is prolonged to ~15secs through mechanical ventilation Pros: a) Minimized hypoxia compared to clamping
   b) Relatively minimal surgical trauma
Cons: a) Frequency of timelapse and overall Imaging duration very short
   b) Image stability is generally poor
No Rat, Mouse 1) A. Tabuchi, M. Mertens, et al., J. Appl. Physiol. 104, 338–346 (2008).
2) H. Mitsuoka, N. Unno, et al., J. Surg. Res. 87, 143–151 (1999).
3) H. Mitsuoka, T. Sakurai, et al., Crit. Care Med. 27, 1862–1868 (1999).
4) P. Schneider, T. Foitzik, et al., Microvasc. Res. 62, 421–434 (2001).
5) E. P. Schmidt, Y. Yang, et al., Nat. Med. 18, 1217–1223 (2012).
6) L. Preu, M. Bischoff, et al., Inflammation (2015).
7) N. T. Veith, T. Tschernig, et al., Respir. Res. 15, 85 (2014).
8) T. Tschernig, N. T. Veith, et al., Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 65, 883–886 (2013).
3 Glue-based Stabilization Lung parenchyma is exposed and glue is utilized to affix a small portion ofthe lung to a coverslip for imaging. Pros: a) Long duration of highly stable continuous imaging is possible
   b) Has been applied to the development of a permanently-placed window enabling longitudinal imaging studies
Cons: a) In some studies substantial inflammation has been reported shortly after window implantation which may complicate interpretation
Yes Mouse 1) D. Kreisel, R. G. Nava, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 18073–18078 (2010).
2) J. H. Spahn, W. Li, et al., J. Immunol. 194, 4039–4048 (2015).
3) D. Entenberg, S. Voiculescu, et al., Nat. Methods. 113. 3073 (2017)
4 Suction-based Stabilization Lung parenchyma is exposed and vacuum-pressure is utilized to stabilize a small portion ofthe lung beneath a coverslip for imaging. Pros: a) Long duration of highly stable continuous imaging is possible
   b) Minimal early inflammation
Cons: a) Imaging sessions limited to ~12 hours
   b) Imaging >6 hours may be confounded by method-induced inflammation
Yes Dog, Rat, Mouse 1) W.W. Wagner, J. Appl. Physiol. 26, 375–377 (1969)
2) D. G. McCormack, S. Mehta, etal, Microvasc. Res. 60, 131–140(2000).
3) N. Funakoshi, M. Onizuka, et al. , Microvasc. Res. 59, 361–367 (2000).
4) H. M. Razavi, L. F.Wang, etal., Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 170, 227–233 (2004).
5) R. G. Presson, M. B. Brown, etal., Am.J.Pathol.179,75–82 (2011).
6) M. R. Looney, E. E. Thornton, et al., , Nat. Methods 8, 91–96 (2011).
7) E. E. Thornton, M. R. Looney,et al.,,J. Exp. Med.209, 1183–1199 (2012).
8) S. Devi, Y. Wang, etal., , J. Exp. Med. 210, 2321–2336 (2013).
9) G. Ortiz-Muñoz, B. Mallavia, et al., Blood 124, 2625–2634 (2014).
10) M. F. Bennewitz, et al., IntraVital 3, e29748 (2014).
11) A. Caudrillier, B. Mallavia, et al., PLoS One 10, e0133022 (2015).
12) R. N. Hanna, C. Cekic, et al., Science 350, 1–9 (2015).
13) D Entenberg. C. Rodriguez-Tirado, et. al., Intravital 4:31–11 (2015)
14) M.B. Headley, A. Bins, etal.,Nature.531. 513–517.(2016)
15) S.Z. Chong, M. Evrard, et al., J.Exp.Med.213. 2293–2314. (2016)
16) E. Lefrancais, G. Ortiz-Munoz, etal., Nature. 544.105–109. (2017)
16) B.G.Yipp, J.H. Kim, etal., SciImmunol.2 (2017)
17) E. Lefrancais, B. Mallavia, etal.JCI Insight. 3(3) (2018)