Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;12(12):1557–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.08.008

Table 3.

Comparison of test outcomes from MP (High/Low Risk) between NGS assessed at Agendia Amsterdam central laboratory and NGS assessed at the beta sites (n = 114). These results show a Negative Predictive Agreement (Low Risk) of 98.3% (58/59, 95% CI: 91.0–99.7), a Positive Predictive Agreement (High Risk) of 89.1% (49/55, 95% CI: 78.2–94.9), a concordance of 93.9% and a Cohen's kappa of 0.88.

NGS Agendia
High Risk Low Risk Total
NGS Beta Sites High Risk 49 1 50
Low Risk 6 58 64
Total 55 59 114∗

For 10 samples, no NGS results were obtained at Agendia.