Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 13;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1574-5

Table 5.

Comparison of the percentages of γδ T cell subsets in IFN-β-treated MS patients stratified to the NEDA or EDA groups

MS w/IFN-β HCs (n = 44) p value (K-W test) padj value
NEDA (n = 8) EDA (n = 13) NEDA vs. HCs EDA vs. HCs NEDA vs. EDA
Vδ1+ 39.5 (21.1–55.9) 17.4 (11.6–38.5) 18.4 (11.6–34.2) NS
 Vδ1+Vγ9+ 3.01 (1.32–10.7) 2.99 (1.60–3.94) 2.15 (1.12–4.71) NS
 Vδ1+Vγ9 36.4 (17.5–51.9) 15.2 (9.18–31.9) 15.5 (8.47–31.5) NS
Vδ2+ 14.2 (3.17–25.2) 24.7 (6.33–42.9) 54.9 (31.7–65.9) < 0.001 < 0.001 0.006 NS
 Vδ2+Vγ9+ 14.1 (2.76–25.0) 24.3 (6.09–42.8) 54.3 (31.1–65.7) < 0.001 < 0.001 0.005 NS
 Vδ2+Vγ9 0.12 (0.00–0.26) 0.18 (0.06–0.84) 0.08 (0.03–0.29) NS
Vδ1Vδ2 32.3 (20.0–61.8) 36.1 (28.4–54.0) 22.8 (17.1–30.3) < 0.001 0.033 < 0.001 NS
 Vδ1Vδ2Vγ9+ 1.68 (0.30–2.83) 1.01 (0.26–2.23) 2.42 (1.25–3.83) 0.025 NS (0.061) 0.022 NS
 Vδ1Vδ2Vγ9 28.2 (17.1–60.7) 35.1 (27.5–51.0) 18.1 (10.7–26.4) < 0.001 0.011 < 0.001 NS

Values are the median (IQR). Percentages of each population in total γδ T cells are shown

p values (K-W test) were obtained by Kruskal-Wallis analyses, and if they were statistically significant, then padj values were calculated using multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age and sex

EDA evidence of disease activity, HCs healthy controls, IFN-β interferon-β, IQR interquartile ranges, K-W Kruskal-Wallis, MS multiple sclerosis, NEDA no-evidence of disease activity, NS not significant, w/ with