TABLE 3.
Model: lmer(log(RT) ∼ Previous.trial + (1| Subject) + (1| Items), data = data.current.C/data.current.I/data.current.N, REML = FALSE) | ||||||
Current item | Comparisons | df | β | SE | t | p |
Congruent | CC – IC | 1530.98 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 6.2 | p < 0.001∗ |
CC – NC | 1522.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 4.2 | p < 0.001∗ | |
NC – IC | 1531.17 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −2.43 | p = 0.015 | |
Incongruent | II – NI | 1531.16 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −2.42 | p = 0.015 |
II – CI | 1165.98 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 1.86 | p = 0.062 | |
NI – CI | 1266.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.69 | p = 0.492 | |
Neutral | NN – CN | 1500.81 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −3.37 | p < 0.001∗ |
NN – IN | 1494.48 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −3.99 | p < 0.001∗ | |
CN – IN | 1512.85 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.7 | p = 0.474 |
To obtain these values, six models were mandatory, implying that, according to Bonferroni correction method, ∗the significance threshold is reduced to 0.008.