TABLE 6.
Model: lmer(log(RT) ∼ Previous.trial + (1| Subject) + (1| Items), data = data.current.C/data.current.I/data.current.N, REML = FALSE) | |||||||
Current item | Comparisons | RT(SD) | df | β | SE | t | p |
Congruent | CC – IC | −49.5(−4.8) | 6587.59 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 13.77 | p < 0.001∗ |
CC – NC | −27.7(−3.9) | 6495.89 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 6.8 | p < 0.001∗ | |
NC – IC | −23.7(−0.9) | 6595.42 | –0.04 | 0.01 | –7.64 | p < 0.001∗ | |
Incongruent | II – NI | 10(6.4) | 5438.21 | –0.01 | 0.01 | –3.12 | p < 0.001∗ |
II – CI | 0.6(6.1) | 4784.87 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.32 | p = 0.75 | |
NI – CI | −9.4(−0.3) | 5364.33 | –0.01 | <0.01 | –2.33 | p = 0.02 | |
Neutral | NN – CN | −10.2(−3) | 6535.87 | –0.01 | <0.01 | –3.27 | p = 0.002∗ |
NN – IN | −20.4(−2) | 6529.69 | –0.03 | <0.01 | –7.79 | p < 0.001∗ | |
CN – IN | −10.2(1) | 6551.47 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 4.98 | p < 0.001∗ |
Seven models were necessary to estimate all the comparisons. After Bonferroni correction, ∗the significance threshold was reduced to 0.008.