Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;10:645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00645

Table 2.

Emotional Stroop results on the HTA and LTA group: (1) reaction times (RTs, in ms) of test-related threatening words, neutral words, and test-related threatening interference, and (2) accuracy (in %) of test-related threatening and neutral words (M ± SD).

Condition RT Accuracy
HTA (N = 26) LTA (N = 20) HTA (N = 26) LTA (N = 20)
Test-related threatening 502.78 ± 95.13*** 453.90 ± 78.47 99.88 ± 1.45** 98.35 ± 1.63
Neutral 480.84 ± 89.91 452.25 ± 79.58 97.88 ± 2.17 99.25 ± 0.96*
Interference 21.94 ± 38.77 1.64 ± 21.14

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

HTA, high test-anxious; LTA, low test-anxious; Interference: the RT as observed in the test-related threatening condition minus the RT as observed in the neutral condition.