Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S241–S247. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz617

Table 1.

Study design

Phase Location Na Balance Aid Objective Measures
I 4 BCUs, 1 high- fidelity BCU mockup 38 Chair (n = 10) To observe HCW behavior in four existing BCUs and a high-fidelity mockup unit and identify key built environment requirements for the doffing area [14] Performance (Behavioral coding for number and occurrence of risky behaviors)
Physical Load (REBA/RULAbscore)
Cognitive Load
(NASA TLXc score)
L-shaped step stool (n = 17)
Vertical grab bar (n = 8)
No aid (n = 3)
II A 1 High-fidelity BCU mockup 31 Stool To compare different balance aids, levels of doffing area demarcation and define the optimized layout
L-shaped step stool
Vertical grab bar
Horizontal grab bar
II B 1 High-fidelity BCU mockup 9 Vertical grab bar To compare two optimized layouts and select one to test with HCWs
Horizontal grab bar
III 1 High-fidelity BCU mockup 9 Horizontal grab bar To observe HCW behavior in the optimized layout and make comparisons with existing BCUs (phase I)

aN represents the number of participants who used a balance aid. In Phase I each HCW used the balance aid used in their unit; in Phase II students did multiple rounds of simulations, using each of the aids provided; in Phase III there was only one balance aid option.

bRapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA).

cNASA Task Load Index (TLX).