Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2019 Mar 21;90:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.041

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Yield stress as a function of pore morphology for all compositions examined (PCLonly, HA15, HA30, Dual Gradient). Similar to the results for compressive modulus, small-pore scaffolds had higher yield stresses compared to all other groups, which were statistically similar (p < 0.05). Groups with the same letter are not statistically different (p > 0.05). n = 5 scaffolds for all groups.