Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2019 Jul 3;40(9):1593–1611. doi: 10.1002/humu.23802

Table 5.

Overall accuracies (ACC) and MCC for our two methods (MLR and NN, with and without splicing) and the general methods (PMut, PolyPhen-2, PON-P2, and SIFT) in the CAGI dataset.

(A) BRCA1
IARC 5-tier MLR MLR+AS NN NN+AS PMut PolyPhen-2 PON-P2 SIFT
ACC 0.326 0.347 0.201 0.222 0.028 0.208 0.014 0.049
MCC −0.041 0.006 0.015 0.056 −0.002 0.031 0 0.021
Three Class MLR MLR+AS NN NN+AS PMut PolyPhen-2 PON-P2 SIFT
ACC 0.764 0.785 0.25 0.271 0.035 0.354 0.014 0.118
MCC −0.237 0.354 −0.012 0.055 0.026 0.136 0 0.123
(B) BRCA2
IARC 5-tier MLR MLR+AS NN NN+AS PMut PolyPhen-2 PON-P2 SIFT
ACC 0.161 0.167 0.345 0.351 0.144 0.305 0.011 0.034
MCC −0.109 −0.068 −0.017 −0.006 −0.029 0.078 0 0.017
Three Class MLR MLR+AS NN NN+AS PMut PolyPhen-2 PON-P2 SIFT
ACC 0.931 0.931 0.69 0.695 0.184 0.431 0.011 0.086
MCC 0.18 0.277 0.185 0.213 −0.013 0.125 0 0.022