Fig. 4.

Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) analysis. CMAP wave patterns recorded from the whisker pad of rat after supramaximal stimulation in the control (A) and DFAT (B) groups. (C) There were no significant differences between the control and DFAT groups in amplitude (0.88 ± 0.56 mV vs. 2.8 ± 2.5 mV), (D) duration (0.63 ± 0.078 mV vs. 0.60 ± 0.18 mV), and (E) latency (4.38 ± 1.42 ms vs. 4.68 ± 2.27 ms). The bars above and under the columns show the standard deviations (SDs). The abbreviation “n.s.” indicates non-significance.