Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 14;19:256. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2668-4

Table 3.

Antifungal activity of A. jacquemontii extracts against five fungal strains

Microorganism Diameter of growth inhibition zone (mm)
n-Hex CHCl3 Ace EtOAc EtOH MeOH EtOH+ CHCl3 MeOH + C CHCl3 Ace + EtOAc EtOH+ EtOAc MeOH+ EtOAc Terbinafine
F. fumagatus -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 ± 0.71
M. specie -- 7.5 ± 0.70 b* 6.25 ± 0.70 cd* 6.2 ± 0.76 cd* -- 9.7 ± 0.41a* 5.7 ± 0.75 cd* -- -- 5.5 ± 0.70e* 7 ± 0.706a* 15 ± 0.77
A. niger -- 7.0 ± 0.71a* 7.5 ± 1.41ab* -- -- 7.7 ± 0.71a* 6.5 ± 0.71 c* 06 ± 0.71c* 6.7 ± 0.71bc* 6.25 ± 0.70c* 6.2 ± 0.71c* 11 ± 0.56
F. soloni -- -- 7.0 ± 0.71b* -- -- -- 6.2 ± 0.71c* 9.8 ± 0.71a* -- -- -- 22 ± 0.81
F. flavus -- -- -- -- -- 9.5.0 ± 0.11a* 8.7 ± 1.96b* -- -- -- -- 12 ± 0.45

Values are presented as mean + SD (n = 3)

--: no zone of inhibition, LSD all pair wise comparison Alpha 0.05 a*, b*, etc.in which the means are not significantly different from one another

Positive control = Terbinafine, Negative control = DMSO (no zone of inhibition)