Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 15;124(7):1069–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.008

Table 2.

Comparison of NT-proBNP levels (pg/mL)

QRS Duration Pacing Site BMI
 All patients (n = 19) p value < 150ms (n = 12) ≥ 150ms (n = 7) p value RA* (n = 8) Physiologic (n = 4) RV (n = 7) p value < 30 (n = 10) ≥ 30 (n = 9) P value
Visit A (Baseline) 915±920 1029±1114 719±437 0.5 484±449 1363±1033 1152±1150 0.21 1159±1164 644±469 0.23
Visit B (80bpm) 815±731 729±791 963±643 0.51 495±439 781±775 1201±875 0.18 843±851 785±620 0.87
A-B Absolute Change in NT-proBNP −100±452 0.35 −300±410 243±294 <0.01 12±143 −582±410 49±554 0.04 −316±466 141±301 0.02
Visit C# (Baseline) 911±922 868±1037 1015±648 0.78 366±181 1352±1465 1254±824 0.12 1082±1116 668±528 0.38
B-C Absolute Change in NT-proBN P 53±493 0.66 139±546 −151±284 0.28 −74±345 572±692 −143±254 0.04 239±495 −211±377 0.04
A-C Absolute Change in NT-proBN P −78±475 0.51 −161±512 123±331 0.27 −110±379 −11±576 −84±587 0.95 −78±531 −77±422 0.99

Values are mean ± SD

*

RA = Right atrial appendage pacing

physiologic = His/Bachmann’s bundle pacing

RV = Right ventricular apical septum pacing

#

As one patient did not complete visit C, all analyses involving data from visit C included n = 18 patients