. 2019 Sep 2;2019:2629673. doi: 10.1155/2019/2629673

Table 4.

Difference between association values of self-reported and observed ADL abilities and EORTC QoL.

ADL-I (middle), z-score (P value)^∗	AMPS motor (middle)	AMPS process (middle)
ADL-I (middle), z-score (P value)^∗	0.316 (0.75)	0.286 (0.77)

ADL-I (high), z-score (P value)^∗	AMPS motor (high)	AMPS process (high)
ADL-I (high), z-score (P value)^∗	0.585 (0.56)	0.518 (0.60)

ADL-I: ADL Interview; AMPS: Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. ^∗The presented estimates are based on z-tests for differences between two odds ratios (OR) according to the ADL ability subgroups; middle and high and its impact on EORTC QoL, item #30 “Global Quality of Life” in the European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Level of significance: P < 0.05.