Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep;34(5):427–433. doi: 10.5001/omj.2019.78

Table 1. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire items and average response for each item. Total responses = 549.

Questionnaire items Mean SD
Q1 Consistently demonstrated how different tasks should be performed. 4.4 0.8
Q2 Clearly explained the important elements for the execution of a given task. 4.4 0.8
Q3 Created sufficient opportunities for me to observe them. 4.5 0.8
Q4 Was a role model as to the kind of health professional I wish to become. 4.4 0.8
Q5 Observed me multiple times during patient encounters. 4.4 0.9
Q6 Provided me with useful feedback during or following direct observation of patient encounters. 4.4 0.8
Q7 Helped me understand which aspects I needed to improve. 4.4 0.8
Q8 Adjusted teaching activities to my level of experience. 4.4 0.8
Q9 Offered me sufficient opportunities to perform activities independently. 4.4 0.9
Q10 Supported me in activities I find difficult to perform. 4.3 0.9
Q11 Gradually reduced the support given to allow me to perform certain activities more independently. 4.4 0.8
Q12 Asked me to provide a rationale for my actions. 4.4 0.8
Q13 Helped me to become aware of gaps in my knowledge and skills. 4.4 0.8
Q14 Asked me questions aimed at increasing my understanding. 4.5 0.8
Q15 Encouraged me to ask questions to increase my understanding. 4.4 0.8
Q16 Stimulated me to explore my strengths and weaknesses. 4.4 0.8
Q17 Stimulated me to consider how I might improve my strengths and weaknesses. 4.4 0.8
Q18 Encouraged me to formulate learning goals. 4.4 0.8
Q19 Encouraged me to pursue my learning goals. 4.4 0.8
Q20 Encouraged me to learn new things. 4.4 0.8
Q21 Created a safe learning environment. 4.4 0.8
Q22 Took sufficient time to supervise me. 4.4 0.9
Q23 Was genuinely interested in me as a student. 4.4 0.9
Q24 Showed me respect. 4.4 0.9
Overall tutor assessment out of 10 8.8 1.8

SD: standard deviation.