Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 2;9(17):9564–9579. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5475

Table 1.

Genetic diversity in 12 populations of S. humboldtiana

ID Pop Basin N Na Ne Ar Pa H E Ho F
1 Charo L 9 5 3.5 4.09 3 0.78 0.79 0.048
2 Queréndaro L 6 3.9 3.2 3.69 1 0.742 0.857 −0.243
3 Lerma L 9 5 3.8 4.34 1 0.768 0.653 −0.057
4 Penjamo L 6 4.9 3.5 4.47 4 0.703 0.667 −0.082
5 Jiquilpan L 8 4.9 3.6 4.28 2 0.723 0.719 −0.411
6 Sn. Juanico B 5 3.9 2.9 3.87 1 0.631 0.65 −0.224
7 Tocumbo B 9 5.1 3.6 4.30 2 0.734 0.667 −0.001
8 La Parota B 5 1.6 1.5 1.62 1 0.361 0.1 0.905 HD
9 Yautepec B 17 4.6 2.4 3.08 5 0.534 0.354 0.712 HD
10 B. Amacuzac B 19 3.5 2.0 2.77 4 0.502 0.323 0.092 HD
11 A. Amacuzac B 15 3.7 2.4 2.66 2 0.521 0.482 −0.188
12 Ameca A 9 3.5 2.3 2.99 2 0.543 0.407 0.629 HD
  Total   117 101 4.146 5.061 28 0.778 0.5 0.36

HD: Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium (significant heterozygote deficit; p < .05).

Abbreviations: Ar: allelic richness (rarefacted); Basin: L: Lerma, B: Balsas, A: Ameca; F: inbreeding coefficient; H E: expected heterozygosity; H o: observed heterozygosity; ID: identification number of population; N: number of individuals analyzed; Na: mean number of alleles per locus; Ne: mean number of effective alleles per locus; Pa: number of private alleles; Pop: population name.