Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 2;9(17):9564–9579. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5475

Table 2.

Results of analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Salix humboldtiana in central Mexico based on eight nSSRs loci with different population groupings: among and within all populations and grouped according to basin (Balsas/Lerma) and according to the results of the Bayesian clustering algorithms GENELAND and STRUCTURE

Grouping df R ST F ST
SS VC % SS VC %
Basin
Among groups 1 44,098.3 354.7 28.9*** 66.8 0.5 13.6***
Among populations within groups 10 75,334.8 368.5 30.1*** 139.3 0.6 18.4***
Within populations 222 111,525.5 502.4 41 505.1 2.3 67.9
Total 233 230,958.6 1,225.5   711.2 3.3  
Structure
Among groups 2 85,404.2 531.2 44*** 113.6 0.6 18.7***
Among populations within groups 9 34,029 173.8 14*** 95.2 0.4 12.9***
Within populations 222 111,525.5 502.4 42 509.2 2.3 68.4
Total 233 230,958.6 1,207.4   718.0 3.4  
Geneland
Among groups 7 115,947.5 564.5 50.9*** 178.8 0.7 21.38***
Among populations within groups 4 4,552.5 32.4 2.9*** 27.3 0.2 7.37***
Within populations 222 112,631.4 513 46.2 505.2 2.3 71.25
Total 233 233,232.3 1,109.9   711.2 3.2  
Populations
Among populations 11 120,499.9 543.7 51.8*** 208.8 0.87 27.47***
Among individuals within populations 222 112,631.4 512.9 48.3 509.194 2.32 72.52
Total 233 233,131.3 1,063   711.2 3.1  

Analyses were performed with both the infinite alleles (F ST) and stepwise (R ST) mutation models.

Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; SS, sum of squares; VC, variance components.

***

p < .001.