Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;8(12):5564–5573. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2369

Table 2.

Results of pooled estimates of studies

  Study number Sensitivity Specificity PLR NLR DOR AUC I 2 sensitivity I 2 specificity
Diagnostic test accuracy analysis: high‐grade gliomas vs low‐grade gliomas
All 14 0.93 [0.87‐0.96] 0.90 [0.82‐0.94] 9.2 [5.1‐16.6] 0.08 [0.05‐0.15] 113 [42‐305] 0.96 [0.94‐0.98] 57.25 [31.82‐82.69] 41.57 [4.74‐78.41]
Two‐compartment model 12 0.91 [0.85‐0.95] 0.89 [0.81‐0.94] 8.4 [4.5‐15.6] 0.10 [0.06‐0.17] 82 [31‐216] 0.96 [0.93‐0.97] 47.97 [13.28‐82.67] 40.25 [0.00‐80.85]
model‐independent 2 Study number is too small
Ktrans 8 0.93 [0.84‐0.97] 0.91 [0.82‐0.96] 10.2 [4.9‐21.1] 0.08 [0.04‐0.18] 128 [44‐368] 0.97 [0.95‐0.98] 67.59 [43.47‐91.71] 44.58 [0.00‐89.71]
ve 5 0.87 [0.77‐0.93] 0.95 [0.82‐0.99] 18.9 [4.4‐80.1] 0.13 [0.07‐0.25] 141 [22‐883] 0.96 [0.93‐0.97] 35.46 [0.00‐98.77] 43.83 [0.00‐100.00]
vp 6 0.83 [0.67‐0.92] 0.91 [0.77‐0.97] 9.0 [3.2‐25.9] 0.19 [0.09‐0.41] 49 [9‐256] 0.94 [0.92‐0.96] 75.46 [55.49‐95.43] 45.74 [0.00‐96.03]
hot‐spot ROI 10 0.95 [0.89‐0.98] 0.90 [0.82‐0.95] 9.3 [5.0‐17.2] 0.05 [0.02‐0.13] 175 [52‐594] 0.96 [0.94‐0.98] 66.15 [43.47‐88.83] 39.94 [0.00‐84.35]
whole volume ROI 4 0.85 [0.73‐0.92] 0.92 [0.68‐0.98] 10.9 [2.2‐53.7] 0.16 [0.08‐0.32] 67 [9‐514] 0.92 [0.90‐0.94] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00] 58.80 [13.48‐100.00]
Diagnostic test accuracy analysis: recurrence vs treatment‐related changes
All 9 0.88 [0.74‐0.95] 0.86 [0.78‐0.91] 6.4 [3.8‐10.5] 0.13 [0.06‐0.32] 47 [14‐156] 0.89 [0.86‐0.91] 72.77 [54.46‐91.08] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00]
Two‐compartment model 6 0.77 [0.65‐0.86] 0.85 [0.75‐0.92] 5.2 [2.9‐9.3] 0.27 [0.17‐0.44] 19 [8‐47] 0.87 [0.84‐0.90] 45.62 [0.00‐96.02] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00]
model‐independent 4 0.94 [0.86‐0.98] 0.85 [0.74‐0.93] 6.5 [3.4‐12.3] 0.07 [0.03‐0.16] 93 [29‐300] 0.96 [0.94‐0.97] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00]
Ktrans 6 0.75 [0.63‐0.84] 0.79 [0.68‐0.87] 3.6 [2.3‐5.8] 0.32 [0.21‐0.49] 11 [5‐25] 0.82 [0.78‐0.85] 40.32 [0.00‐95.54] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00]
ve 2 Study number is too small
vp 2 Study number is too small
hot‐spot ROI 2 Study number is too small
whole volume ROI 7 0.91 [0.73‐0.97] 0.88 [0.78‐0.93] 7.3 [3.8‐13.8] 0.11 [0.03‐0.34] 68 [14‐328] 0.91 [0.88‐0.93] 76.12 [58.35‐93.89] 0.00 [0.00‐100.00]
Diagnostic test accuracy analysis: primary central nervous system lymphomas vs high‐grade gliomas
All 5 0.78 [0.63‐0.89] 0.81 [0.67‐0.90] 4.1 [2.1‐7.7] 0.27 [0.14‐0.51] 15 [5‐50] 0.86 [0.83‐0.89] 51.10 [2.09‐100.00] 69.63 [41.11‐98.16]
Two‐compartment model 4 0.75 [0.53‐0.89] 0.83 [0.69‐0.92] 4.5 [2.0‐10.3] 0.30 [0.14‐0.67] 15 [3‐70] 0.86 [0.83‐0.89] 45.87 [0.00‐100.00] 67.52 [32.79‐100.00]
model‐independent 1 Study number is too small
Ktrans 2 Study number is too small
ve 3 Study number is too small
vp 1 Study number is too small
hot‐spot ROI 1 Study number is too small
whole tumor ROI 4 0.82 [0.67‐0.91] 0.81 [0.64‐0.91] 4.3 [2.0‐9.2] 0.22 [0.11‐0.47] 19 [5‐77] 0.88 [0.85‐0.90] 50.13 [0.00‐100.00] 77.41 [54.83‐99.99]

The numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; ROI, region of interest.