Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;7(6):e12484. doi: 10.2196/12484

Table 3.

Descriptive characteristics of the clusters.

Characteristic Cluster 1 (n=218) Cluster 2 (n=153) Cluster 3 (n=58) Cluster 4 (n=30)
Marital status, n (%)        
  Partnered 146 (67.0) 121 (79.1) 32 (55.2) 28 (93.3)
  No partner 61 (28.0) 28 (18.3) 25 (43.1) 2 (6.7)
  Prefer not to disclose 11 (5.0) 4 (2.6) 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
Education, n (%)        
  High school or lower 28 (12.8) 20 (13.1) 13 (22.4) 8 (26.7)
  Some post-secondary 59 (27.1) 46 (30.1) 12 (20.7) 6 (20.0)
  University 131 (60.1) 87 (56.9) 33 (56.9) 16 (53.3)
Australian-born, n (%) 181 (83.0) 127 (83.0) 39 (67.2) 26 (86.7)
Social Cognitive Theory, mean (SD)        
  Goal setting 3.1 (1.0) 2.9 (1.0) 2.9 (1.0) 2.8 (0.9)
  Outcome expectations 3.3 (0.4) 3.3 (0.4) 3.4 (0.4) 3.3 (0.4)
  Intention 4.1 (0.7) 4.0(0.6) 3.9 (0.8) 4.2 (0.7)
12-Item Short Form Health Survey, mean (SD)        
  Physical component 40.2 (5.8) 40.3 (6.4) 40.5 (6.1) 38.9 (7.0)
  Mental component 46.6 (10.0) 50.3 (8.4) 46.8 (9.0) 48.7 (9.7)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, n (%)        
  Very good 13 (6.0) 8 (5.2) 4 (6.9) 0 (0)
  Good 105 (48.2) 70 (45.8) 25 (43.1) 14 (46.7)
  Bad 87 (39.9) 64 (41.8) 23 (39.7) 12 (40.0)
  Very bad 13 (6.0) 11 (7.2) 6 (10.3) 4 (13.3)
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale, mean (SD)        
  Overall depression 5.2 (5.0) 3.9 (4.8) 6.0 (5.6) 4.2 (5.5)
  Overall anxiety 3.9 (3.8) 2.7 (3.1) 5.0 (5.2) 3.0 (3.5)