Table 2.
Survey results (N = 85)
| Survey statement (relevant ACGME core competencies) | Mean (SD)a |
|---|---|
| This presentation was valuable to my education | 4.5 (0.5) |
| I learned more about the presentation, diagnostic approach, and/or treatment of skin disease in international and/or resource-limited settings (MK, PC) | 4.5 (0.6) |
| I learned more about the presentation, diagnostic approach, and/or treatment of skin disease that may be useful for my current practice in the US (MK, PC) | 4.1 (0.8) |
| I learned more about socioeconomic, cultural, and/or political determinants of health in international and/or resource-limited settings (ICS, P) | 4.6 (0.5) |
| I learned to better appreciate ethical dilemmas, differences in cultural values, and/or challenges confronted in practicing medicine in international and/or resource-limited settings (ICS, P) | 4.5 (0.6) |
| I feel more comfortable in engaging individuals and communities from different socioeconomic, cultural, and/or political backgrounds in my current practice in the US (ICS, P) | 4.1 (0.9) |
| I learned more about different healthcare systems and utilizing available resources needed to diagnose or treat patients in international and/or resource-limited settings (SBP) | 4.2 (0.7) |
| I learned more about the applications, strengths, and/or limitations of teledermatology consultations in providing specialist care in international and/or resource-limited settings (SBP) | 4.2 (0.7) |
| I would rather discuss only US-based cases for future Grand Rounds | 1.6 (0.8) |
| This presentation made me more interested in global dermatology | 4.1 (0.8) |
| I would recommend Global Teledermatology Virtual Grand Rounds to a colleague | 4.5 (0.6) |
MK, medical knowledge; PC, patient care; ICS, interpersonal and communication skills; P, professionalism; SBP, systems-based practice
a
Based on 5-point Likert scales with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree with each statement.