Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222402

Table 3. Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and non-molecular methods against composite culture for the diagnosis of presumptive TBLN patients.

Laboratory methods Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI)
Cytology 94.1%(91.5–96.5) 53.6%(48.4–58.8) 62.1%(57.1–67.1) 91.8%(89–94.6)
Xpert MTB/RIF 78%(73.7–82.3) 74%(69.4–78.6) 71%(66.3–75.7) 81%(76.9–85.1)
ZN 30.9%(26–35.7) 98.8%(97.8–99.8) 95.5%(93.5–97.5) 63.8%(58.8–68.8)
FM 47%(941.8–52.2) 94%(91.5–96.5) 86.5%(83–90) 68.7%(63.9–73.5)