Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;133(7):762–769. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0693

Table 2.

Effects of Low Vision Rehabilitation Intervention

AI Change Score, Logits MCID Criteria,a %
Visual Ability Mean (SD) ITT Sample Effect Size (ITT Sample), d Achieved (95% CI) Achieved (ITT Sample)
Goals/overall visual ability (n = 468) 0.89(1.02) 0.79 0.87 (0.82) 47(44–50) (41)
Reading (n = 422) 0.45 (1.12) 0.40 0.40 (0.38) 44 (42–48) (40)
Mobility (n = 269) 0.50(1.25) 0.45 0.40 (0.38) 27 (25–31) (25)
Visual information processing (n = 393) 0.42 (0.83) 0.38 0.51 (0.46) 33 (31–37) (30)
Visual motor function (n = 398) 0.54(1.13) 0.48 0.48 (0.45) 38 (36–42) (34)

Abbreviations: AI, activity inventory; ITT, intention-to-treat;

MCID, minimum clinically important difference.

a

Criterion is met if the change score exceeds 1.96 (standard errors of the change score estimate).