Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 16;2019(9):CD012643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012643.pub2
Methods Secondary citation(s)
  • Zinzani 2006


Language of publication
  • English


Study design
  • Retrospective, multi‐centre study (2 centres)


Study centre(s)
  • Bologna and Florence, Italy


Country
  • Italy


Median follow‐up time (range)
  • 45 months (6‐100)

Participants Number of included participants
  • 304


Inclusion criteria
  • Diagnosed with HL


Exclusion criteria
  • Other treatment regimens than ABVD

  • Secondary lymphomas

  • Continuation of therapy during data analysis


Consent
  • Yes; written informed consent


Recruitment period
  • June 1997 to June 2009


Age (range, in years)
  • 32 (13‐78)


Ethnic group(s)
  • Not reported


Stages of disease
  • All stages


Comorbidities
  • Assessed, but not reported


Therapy regimen
  • ABVD dependent on disease stage: early stages 6x ABVD or 4x ABVD with radiotherapy; advanced stages 6x ABVD

Prognostic factor(s) Prognostic factor(s)
  • Interim PET


Definition of prognostic factor(s)
  • Not reported


Timing of prognostic factor measurement
  • After cycle 2 of ABVD


Method for measurement (use of specific scale and cut‐off)
  • Juweid criteria

  • PET positive considered if focal FDG uptake that could not be attributed to physiological biodistribution, benign uptake or normal anatomy, with clearly increased activity relative to the background, excluding participants with minimal residual uptake

  • 2 experienced board‐certified nuclear medicine physicians interpreted all scans


Was the same definition and method for measurement used in all participants?
  • Yes


Were prognostic factor(s) assessed blinded for outcome(s), and for each other (if relevant)?
  • No

Notes Conflict of interest
  • None


Funding
  • This work was partially supported by BolognAIL (Bologna, Italy).

ABVD: adriamycin/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine; BEACOPP: bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone; ePET: early positron emission tomography; FDG: [18F]‐fluorodeoxy‐D‐glucose; HL: Hodgkin lymphoma; HR: hazard ratio; IF‐RT: involved‐field radiation therapy; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; IQR: interquartile range; NPV: negative predictive value; OS: overall survival; PET: positron emission tomography; PET‐CT: positron emission tomography computed tomography; PFS: progression‐free survival; PPV: positive predictive value.