Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;13(5):437–452. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09533-0

Table 1.

Results of control test 1

Dataset Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4*
AD 0%/0% 0%/NA 89%/34% 0%/0%
WM 0%/18% 0%/NA 0%/0% 0%/18%
Emotions 0%/0% 0%/NA 0%/ 0% 0%/0%

Out of the 300 iterations, fraction of times in which random features outperformed real data (first number of the cell), and fraction of times in which shuffled data outperformed real data (second number of the cell). Method 2 was not considered for generating shuffled data because it deals with spatial synchrony, not with temporal structure. *Shuffled data is not expected to destroy all the information provided by Method 4