Table 4.

Pearson correlation between CpGs and first two principal components (PCs) of six Houseman cell-type adjustments.

		PC1	PC2
CpG1	Pearson correlation	−.470**	.258**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	781	781
CpG2	Pearson correlation	−.329**	.297**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	759	759
CpG3	Pearson correlation	−.493**	.311**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	724	724
CpG4	Pearson correlation	−.671**	.447**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	813	813
CpG5	Pearson correlation	−.653**	.464**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	791	791
CpG6	Pearson correlation	−.700**	.456**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	778	778
CpG7	Pearson correlation	−.645**	.496**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	741	741
CpG8	Pearson correlation	−.751**	.415**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	802	802
CpG9	Pearson correlation	−.727**	.436**
	Significance (two-tailed)	< 2.22 × 10−13	< 2.22 × 10−13
	N	761	761