Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;16(17):3015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173015

Table 5.

Comparison of methodologies and concentrations for nicotine-related alkaloids in (A) E-liquids and (B) electronic cigarette (ECIG)-generated aerosol of the current study compared with other studies.

A. NRAs in E-liquids
Study E-Liquid Brand Extraction Process Measured by Nornicotine Contine Anabasine Anatabine Myosmine
Current Study Various refill solutions 420 µL of E-liquid diluted in 10 mL of methanol HPLC-PDA 5-21 BDL-15 µg/mL BDL-66 15-835 3-37
Trehy et al. [9] Various cartridges Cartridge pad diluted in 50 mL of Methanol HPLC-PDA NA BDL µg/cartridge BDL BDL-0.8 <LOQ-0.1
Etter et al. [12] Various refill solutions Dilution with 1 M ammonia GC-MS or GC-flame ionization BDL-15 BDL-39 µg/mLBDL-83 BDL-374 BDL-77
Liu et al. [17] Laboratory Reference E-liquid 1 to 10 dilution in 100 mM ammonium acetate LC-MS/MS 5 31 µg/g BDL 23 6
Flora et al. [34] Various Cartridges and refill Solutions Dilution with 70% Methanol LC-MS <48 <48 µg/mL #<48 <144 <48
B. NRAs in ECIG-generated aerosol
Study Puff Volume (mL) Number of Puffs Puff /Interval (s) BatteryPower (W) Extraction Process Measured by Nornicotine Contine Anabasine Anatabine Myosmine
Current Study 33.6 45 5/10 5.7 Methanol extraction from a glass fiber disk HPLC-PDA BDL 16 µg/mL @ 8 17 14
Trehy et al. [9] 100 30 ?/60 ? 10% acetonitrile in water using an impinge HPLC-PDA NA BDL µg/cartridge BDL <LOQ BDL
Margham et al. [16] 55 200 3/30 4.5 ammonium acetate extraction from glass fiber disk * HPLC-MS/MS BDL 1 µg/collection <LOQ <LOQ 3
Liu et al. [17] 55 50 3/30 5 ammonium acetate extraction from glass fiber disk * HPLC-MS/MS 0.9 NA µg/collection 2.1 6.0 <LOQ
Flora et al. [34] 55 100 4/30 ? extraction from glass fiber disk LC-MS <45-53 <49 µg/mL ! <38-44 128-138 <47

NA = not available; BDL = below detection limit or <LOD; ? = information not specified: * = used CORESTA methods [37]; # = Concentrations calculated from % of nicotine and assumed nicotine in the cartridges and refill solutions is 24 mg/ml; @ = Concentrations given are based on 100% recovery of the reference E-liquid in the current study; ! = concentrations given are based off transfer efficiencies from the concentrations already specified in part A of this table.