Table 4.
Recommendations | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) ar |
n (%) ar |
n (%) ar |
n (%) ar |
|
Cluster 1:
Inactive Unhealthy Eaters |
5 (25%) 2.8 |
15 (75%) 0.3 |
0 (0%) −2.2 |
0 (0%) −0.6 |
Cluster 2:
Non-technological Sitter |
2 (4.9%) −1.0 |
30 (73.2%) 0.2 |
9 (22%) 0.9 |
0 (0%) −1.0 |
Cluster 3:
Active |
3 (12%) 0.6 |
15 (60%) −1.5 |
5 (20%) 0.4 |
2 (8%) 2.6 |
Cluster 4:
Technological Sleepyhead |
4 (16%) 1.4 |
21 (84%) 1.4 |
0 (0%) −2.5 |
0 (0%) −0.7 |
Cluster 5:
Ideal Health |
0 (0%) −1.6 |
6 (26.1%) −5.3 |
16 (69.6%) 7.1 |
1 (4.3%) 0 |
Cluster 6:
Inactive Healthy Eaters |
1 (2.6%) −1.5 |
38 (97.4%) 4.0 |
0 (0%) −3.3 |
0 (0%) −0.9 |
Note: n = subject frequency; % = percentage; ar = adjusted residuals.