Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;16(17):3151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173151

Table 4.

Association between resulting clusters with recommendations for the 24-hour movement guidelines.

Recommendations 0 1 2 3
n (%)
ar
n (%)
ar
n (%)
ar
n (%)
ar
Cluster 1:
Inactive Unhealthy Eaters
5 (25%)
2.8
15 (75%)
0.3
0 (0%)
−2.2
0 (0%)
−0.6
Cluster 2:
Non-technological Sitter
2 (4.9%)
−1.0
30 (73.2%)
0.2
9 (22%)
0.9
0 (0%)
−1.0
Cluster 3:
Active
3 (12%)
0.6
15 (60%)
−1.5
5 (20%)
0.4
2 (8%)
2.6
Cluster 4:
Technological Sleepyhead
4 (16%)
1.4
21 (84%)
1.4
0 (0%)
−2.5
0 (0%)
−0.7
Cluster 5:
Ideal Health
0 (0%)
−1.6
6 (26.1%)
−5.3
16 (69.6%)
7.1
1 (4.3%)
0
Cluster 6:
Inactive Healthy Eaters
1 (2.6%)
−1.5
38 (97.4%)
4.0
0 (0%)
−3.3
0 (0%)
−0.9

Note: n = subject frequency; % = percentage; ar = adjusted residuals.