Table 1.
Comparison of the designed metasurface with previously reported works.
| Similar Work | Size of Metasurface (mm3) | Frequency Range (<−10 dB) | Bandwidth (%) | Optimization Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [9] | 180 × 180 × 3.5 | 9.4–23.28 | 85 | Chessboard Metasurface |
| [12] | 280 × 280 × 1.694 | 7–16 | 63 | Coding and Digital Metamaterial |
| [15] | 192 × 180 × 4 | 6–14 | 80 | PSO Algorithm |
| [22] | 328 × 328 × 3 | 5.4–7.4 | 67 | Ergodic Algorithm |
| [24] | 400 × 400 × 3.5 | 6–14 | 80 | 01/10 coding metasurface |
| This work | 264 × 264 × 3 | 8.6–22.5 | 92 | Random optimization Algorithm |