Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;2019(9):CD012099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012099.pub2

Comparison 7. Multiple methods of breastfeeding support versus usual care: subgroup analysis by timing of intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Exclusive breastfeeding at 4‐6 weeks 4 445 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.21 [0.83, 1.77]
1.1 Intervention in the antenatal and postnatal period 3 238 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.61, 2.02]
1.2 Intervention in the postnatal period only 1 207 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [1.13, 1.78]
2 Any breastfeeding at 4‐6 weeks 2 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.57, 1.89]
2.1 Intervention in the antenatal and postnatal period 2 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.57, 1.89]
2.2 Intervention in the postnatal period only 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]