Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;4(5):e001604. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001604

Table 4.

Subgroup analyses of cooperation rates in Bangladesh

Control 50 Taka Stratum-specific RR P value* 100 Taka Stratum-specific RR P value*
Gender
 Male 313/757 (41%) 321/586 (55%) 1.32 (1.18 to 1.48) 0.20 318/581 (55%) 1.32 (1.18 to 1.48) 0.88
 Female 39/89 (44%) 46/65 (71%) 1.61 (1.22 to 2.14) 41/69 (59%) 1.36 (1.00 to 1.84)
Age (years)
<25 196/674 (29%) 219/474 (46%) 1.59 (1.36 to 1.85) 0.006 190/447 (43%) 1.46 (1.25 to 1.71) 0.40
 >25 157/553 (28%) 151/471 (32%) 1.13 (0.94 to 1.36) 172/459 (37%) 1.32 (1.11 to 1.58)
Education
 No school 27/74 (36%) 22/57 (39%) 1.06 (0.68 to 1.65) 0.75 30/53 (57%) 1.55 (1.06 to 2.27) 0.28
 Primary 93/199 (47%) 89/166 (54%) 1.15 (0.93 to 1.41) 98/171 (57%) 1.23 (1.01 to 1.49)
Location
 Urban 170/427 (40%) 205/354 (58%) 1.45 (1.26 to 1.68) 0.036 188/349 (54%) 1.35 (1.16 to 1.57) 0.26
 Rural 182/365 (50%) 165/283 (58%) 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35) 172/287 (60%) 1.20 (1.05 to 1.38)

Data are n/N (%) and RR (95% CI). Overall interaction terms were significant for cooperation rates only in the age subgroup: gender, p=0.31; age, p=0.015; education, p=0.32; location, p=0.11.

*P values obtained from an interaction term between intervention groups and demographic characteristic.

RR, risk ratio.