Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;4(5):e001604. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001604

Table 5.

Subgroup analyses of cooperation rates in Uganda

Control 5000 UGX Stratum-specific RR P value* 10 000 UGX Stratum-specific RR P value*
Gender
 Male 282/543 (52%) 308/443 (70%) 1.34 (1.21 to 1.48) 0.023 320/463 (69%) 1.33 (1.20 to 1.47) 0.090
 Female 88/155 (57%) 85/144 (59%) 1.04 (0.86 to 1.26) 88/140 (63%) 1.11 (0.92 to 1.34)
Age (years)
<25 222/485 (46%) 245/403 (61%) 1.33 (1.17 to 1.50) 0.43 250/413 (61%) 1.32 (1.17 to 1.50) 0.76
 >25 149/343 (43%) 146/275 (53%) 1.22 (1.04 to 1.44) 158/284 (56%) 1.28 (1.09 to 1.50)
Education
<Primary 179/308 (58%) 158/234 (68%) 1.16 (1.02 to 1.32) 0.12 159/231 (69%) 1.18 (1.04 to 1.35) 0.18
 >Primary 193/371 (52%) 239/344 (69%) 1.34 (1.18 to 1.51) 250/360 (69%) 1.33 (1.18 to 1.50)
Location
 Urban 206/393 (52%) 228/339 (67%) 1.28 (1.14 to 1.45) 0.60 243/344 (71%) 1.35 (1.20 to 1.51) 0.085
 Rural 165/291 (57%) 168/242 (69%) 1.22 (1.07 to 1.40) 168/257 (65%) 1.15 (1.01 to 1.32)

Data are n/N (%) and RR (95% CI). Overall interaction terms were not significant for cooperation rates in all subgroups: gender, p=0.066; age, p=0.72; education, p=0.27; location, p=0.18.

*P values obtained from an interaction term between intervention groups and demographic characteristic.

RR, risk ratio; UGX, Ugandan Shilling.