Chu 2011.
Methods | Randomisd controlled trial | |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: DCC
Comparator: ECC
Additional information
Comparison 1 DCC with neonatal resuscitation after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup by gestation) Subgroup 1: < 32‐34 weeks' gestation Comparison 2 DCC with neonatal resuscitation after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup by type intervention) Subgroup 1: DCC at < 1 min with baby level with uterus and placenta |
|
Outcomes | IVH, sepsis, anaemia, and hyperbilirubinaemia | |
Notes |
Setting: Toronto, Canada Dates: not reported Trial funding source: not reported Declaration of interest: not reported Further information:
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No information. Clinicians at birth likely to be unblinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess trial protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Compliance: 1 protocol violation ‐ not told which group. No other information. Conference abstract only. |